Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5188 Gua
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010230412022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./223/2024
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
BELTOLA BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, G.S.
ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
MS. BELA SHAH and 3 ORS,
W/O LATE HIMANSHU SHAH @ HIMANSHU H SHAH
R/O THANE P.O. and P.S. THANE, MAHARASTRA, DIST. THANE,
MAHARASTRA
2:MASTER ROHAN SHAH
S/O LATE HIMANGSHU SHAH @ HIMANSHU H SHAH
R/O THANE P.O. and P.S. THANE
MAHARASTRA
DIST. THANE
MAHARASTRA
3:MS. GANGEHEN HANSRAJ SHAH
NOT MENTIONED IN THE CLAIM PETITION
4:THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
MALIGAON BRANCH
GUWAHATI
5:M/S PRERONA TRANSPORT CARRYING CO. P. LTD. (OWNER)
27 KALAPAHAR HILL SIDE
BINOVA NAGAR
GUWAHATI.
6:SHRI PARAG KR SAIKIA
Page No.# 2/3
S/O LATE NIRMAL SAIKIA
R/O VILL BARGUR
TINSUKIA
P/ RESIDENT OF TENGUIPARA
P/S SARPATHAR
DIST- GOLAGHAT
ASSAM.
(DRIVER OF SUPER BUS).
7:MD. SABIDUR ALI
S/O SAHAR ALI
R/O SONALI ENTERPRISE
DR ZAKIR HUSSAIN ROAD
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI.
(OWNER OF TRUCK)
8:SHRI MANGAL DAIMARY
S/O G. R. DAIMARY
R/O ORANG
DARRANG
ASSAM.
(DRIVER OF TRUCK
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
26.07.2024
1. Heard Mr. K.K. Bhatta, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Issue notice to the other respondents.
3. Call for the case record of M.A.C. Case No. 651/2008.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that as the respondent Page No.# 3/3
No. 4 had also filed another appeal challenging the quantum of the compensation awarded by the impugned judgment and said appeal was registered as MAC Appeal No. 21/2016 and same has been disposed of by a co- ordinate bench of this Court by Judgment and Order dated 21.05.2019.
5. The respondent Nos. 4,5,6,7 and 8 are not necessary for disposal of this appeal and their names may be struck off.
6. Considering the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the names of respondent Nos. 4,5,6,7 and 8 is struck off from the memo of appeal.
7. Registry to do the needful.
8. The appellant shall now take steps for issuance of notice of respondent No. 3 only by registered post with A/D as well as through usual mode.
9. The name of Ms. P. Baruah, as counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 may be shown in the cause-list henceforth.
10. Let this case be listed again after 4(four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!