Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5013 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010063242024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/130/2024
MOYNA RAM DAS AND 4 ORS.
S/O LATE NIROD MOHAN DAS,
VILL.- MATIJURI, P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, PIN- 788155.
2: AKAL RAM DAS
S/O LATE NIROD MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
3: RAJU DAS
S/O LATE MONI RAM DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
4: ATUL DAS
S/O LATE MONI RAM DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
5: ANITA DAS
S/O LATE MONIRAM DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155
VERSUS
Page No.# 2/4
ABIRAM DAS AND 10 ORS.
S/O LATE ADAR RAM DAS,
VILL.- MATIJURI, P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, PIN- 788155.
2:MINU RANI DAS
S/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
3:MAMON DAS
D/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
4:PINKI DAS
D/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
5:SUMIT DAS
S/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
6:SAMIR DAS
S/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
7:AMIT DAS
D/O LATE MANJU MOHAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
8:HIMANGSHU DAS
S/O NOT KNOWN
Page No.# 3/4
R/O HAILAKANDI TOWN WARD NO. 11
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788151.
9:SUDHIR DAS @ PACHU DAS
S/O NOBAKUMAR DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI (KAZIRKUNA)
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
10:RAJAN DAS
S/O LATE CHANDAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI (KAZIRKUNA)
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155.
11:SONDYA RANI DAS
W/O LATE CHANDAN DAS
VILL.- MATIJURI (KAZIRKUNA)
P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788155
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GHOSH
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 22.07.2024 Heard Mr. S. K. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellants.
The regular second appeal is admitted for hearing upon the following three substantial questions of law:
1. Whether the learned courts below erred in law in decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs with respect Schedule-1A land Page No.# 4/4
without considering the Ext-A whereby the father of the defendants No. 1 and 2 purchased the tenancy right from the father of the plaintiff on 11.04.1969 though the said Ext-A which were duly proved by the defendants?
2. Whether the learned Courts below erred in law in decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs partly decreeing the suit of the eviction of the appellants from the Schedule-1(A) land without deciding the point for determination as regard as to whether the appellants are non-evictable tenant or not from the suit schedule land more so when both the courts below held that the defendants acquired tenancy right?
3. Whether the learned lower appellate Court erred in law in passing the impugned judgment without complying the provisions of Order XLI Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure?
Issue notice to the respondents.
The appellant shall take steps upon respondents by registered post with A/D within 4(four) weeks.
List this matter after 4(four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!