Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5723 Gua
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010130442022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2063/2022
BHANAMAI BORAH AND 4 ORS.
W/O LATE HEMA BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADULAHATI, WARD NO. 1 (NAGAYA) PS
NARAYANPUR, DIST LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, 784165
2: MISS JURIMONI BORAH
D/O LATE HEMA BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADULAHATI
WARD NO. 1 (NAGAYA) PS NARAYANPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
784165
3: MISS BOBI BORAH
D/O LATE HEMA BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADULAHATI
WARD NO. 1 (NAGAYA) PS NARAYANPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
784165
4: SRI DIGANTA BORAH
S/O LATE HEMA BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADULAHATI
WARD NO. 1 (NAGAYA) PS NARAYANPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
784165
5: MISS JUNMONI BORAH
D/O LATE HEMA BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADULAHATI
WARD NO. 1 (NAGAYA) PS NARAYANPUR
DIST LAKHIMPUR
Page No.# 2/4
ASSAM
78416
VERSUS
N.E. PARIVAHAN AND 2 ORS.
HANUMAN TOWER,
2ND FLOOR, BASISTHA CHARIALI, PO AND PS BASISTHA, DIST KAMRUP
M ASSAM 781028
2:SRI BIKI PAUL
S/O BIKASH PAUL. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BELTOLA
AG OFFICE
TRINAYAN NAGAR
PS AND PO BASISTHA
DIST KAMRUPM ASSAM 781028
3:RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER
ANIL PLAZA
5TH FLOOR
ABC
GS ROAD
GUWAHATI
DISTRICT KAMRUP M ASSAM 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ACHARYA, MS. M DEVI,MR. D BANIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA, MR. K K BHATTA(R-3)
Linked Case :
BHANAMAI BORAH AND 4 ORS.
VERSUS
N.E. PARIVAHAN AND 2 ORS. E
------------
Page No.# 3/4
Advocate for : MR. A ACHARYA
Advocate for : appearing for N.E. PARIVAHAN AND 2 ORS. E
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 09-08-2024
Heard Mr. A. Acharya, learned counsel for the applicant. I have also heard Mr. K. K. Bhatta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3.
This is an application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 28.02.2023, passed by the learned Member, MACT No. 3, Kamrup in MACT case no. 1349/2017.
The ground for delay in not preferring the connected appeal on time has been explained in para 2 of the condonation petition.
Upon consideration, this Court is satisfied that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. Moreover, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal is condoned.
In view of the above, the delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
With the above, this IA stands disposed of.
The Office shall register the connected appeal, and list it for admission by Page No.# 4/4
reflecting the name of Mr. K. K. Bhatta as the learned counsel for the respondent no. 3.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!