Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Md Merajul Islam vs The State Of Assam And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 5598 Gua

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5598 Gua
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024

Gauhati High Court

Md Merajul Islam vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 6 August, 2024

Author: Malasri Nandi

Bench: Malasri Nandi

                                                                          Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010203322023




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./379/2023

            MD MERAJUL ISLAM
            S/O LATE OSMAN ALI
            A RESIDENT OF VILL- DUMUNICHOWKI
            P.O. MARUACHOWKI P.S. SIPAJHAR
            DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
            TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

            2:SWEETY HAZARIKA
             W/O MERAJUL ISLAM
            D/O AZIZUR RAHMAN
            VILL-NORTH MANDAKATA
            P.O. MANDAKATA

            PS. BAIHATA
            DIST. KAMRUP
            ASSAM
            PIN-78112

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M A I HUSSAIN, N ISLAM

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S K CHHETRY (R-2),MR. M ISLAM (R-2),MR. N
UDDIN (R-2)
                                                                            Page No.# 2/5

                                  BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

                                         ORDER

Date : 06.08.2024

Heard Mr. M.A.I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. The petitioner has preferred an application u/s 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 10.07.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Kamrup(M), Guwahati in connection with F.C. (Crl.) Case No. 242/2022, directing the petitioner/husband to pay maintenance allowance of Rs.7,000/- per month to the respondent/wife and her minor daughter till disposal of the case.

3. The respondent/wife had filed an application u/s 125 Cr.P.C. before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, claiming maintenance from her husband i.e., the present petitioner. On receipt of the notice, the petitioner appeared before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Kamrup(M), Guwahati. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, on 10.07.2023, the learned trial court had passed the order directing the petitioner/husband to pay interim maintenance allowance of Rs.7,000/- per month to the respondent /wife and her minor daughter till disposal of the case.

4. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned trial court has failed to appreciate the judgment of the Page No.# 3/5

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh vs. Neha reported in (2021) 2 SCC 324, makes it mandatory to file an affidavit for disclosure of assets and liabilities of the parties in order to arrive at a calculation for determining the quantum of maintenance.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as the impugned order dated 10.07.2023 passed by the trial court is a clear violation of the guidelines referred in the case of Rajnesh (Supra), the order is liable to be set aside with a direction to decide the matter afresh.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the impugned order dated 10.07.2023.

7. As per the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha (Supra) parties were directed to give their declaration regarding their income, assets and liabilities. From the order of the trial court dated 10.07.2023, it reveals that this exercise was not undertaken by the learned trial court in spite of the binding direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

8. The paragraphs of the judgment of Rajnesh (supra) are reproduced as follows -

"..... At present, the issue of interim maintenance is decided on

the basis of pleadings where some amount of guess work or rough estimation takes place, so as to make a prima facie assessment of the amount to be awarded. It is often said that both parties submit scanty material, do not disclose the correct details and suppress vital information, which makes it difficult Page No.# 4/5

for the Family court to make an objective assessment for the grant of interim maintenance. While there is a tendency on the part of the wife to exaggerate her needs, there is a corresponding tendency by the husband to conceal his actual income.

The party claiming maintenance either as a spouse or as a partner in a civil union, leave in relationship, common love marriage, should be required to file a concise application for interim maintenance with limited pleadings along with an affidavit of disclosure of assets and liabilities before the concerned court, as a mandatory requirement.

On the basis of the pleadings filed by both the parties and the affidavits of disclosure, the court would be in a position to make an objective assessment of the approximate amount to be awarded at the interim stage."

9. In view of the aforesaid legal mandates, it can be said that the maintenance is dependent upon factual situations. The court should mould the claim for maintenance brought before it. It is to be noted down that the financial capacity of the husband, his actual income, reasonable expenses for his own maintenance and dependent family members whom he is obliged to maintain under the law, liabilities if any, would be required to be taken into consideration to arrive at the appropriate quantum of maintenance to be paid.

10. In the case in hand, after going through the order of the trial court dated 10.07.2023, it appears that the trial court passed the Page No.# 5/5

impugned order without affording any opportunity to the petitioner to disclose his assets and liabilities which is a gross violation of the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh (Supra).

11. Hence, the impugned order dated 10.07.2023 is set aside with a direction to the trial court to give opportunity to both the parties to submit their respective affidavits disclosing their assets and liabilities and thereafter, to hear the matter afresh and to deliver the judgment/order in accordance with law.

12. If any payment is made earlier by the petitioner in view of the impugned order dated 10.07.2023, the same shall be adjusted accordingly. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated. Parties are directed to appear before the trial court on 27.08.2024 to obtain necessary instruction.

13. In view of the above observation, the criminal revision petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter