Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5559 Gua
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010016612024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/262/2024
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT 87, M.G ROAD, FORT,
MUMBAI AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICES AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH
FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR G.S. ROAD,
GUWAHATI- 781007.
VERSUS
APARAJITA KALITA AND 5 ORS.
W/O LATE UTPAL KALITA,
VILL.- CHARAIMARI, P.S.- MUSHALPUR, DIST.- BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN-
781372.
2:MAKANI KALITA
M/O LATE UTPAL KALITA
VILL.- CHARAIMARI
P.S.- MUSHALPUR
DIST.- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781372.
3:HIMASHRI KALITA
SISTER OF LATE UTPAL KALITA
VILL.- CHARAIMARI
P.S.- MUSHALPUR
DIST.- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781372.
4:GUNGUN KALITA
Page No.# 2/4
D/O LATE UTPAL KALITA
VILL.- CHARAIMARI
P.S.- MUSHALPUR
DIST.- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781372.
5:KAMESWAR BORO
S/O SRI MANIK BORO
VILL.- DALIBARI
BANGALIPARA
P.S.- BARAMA
DIST.- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781346.
6:JWNGBLAW BASUMATARY
S/O LATE LAKHI BASUMATARY
VILL.- PACHIM BANGNABARI
P.S.- MUSHALPUR
DIST.- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781372
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. M SAIKIA,MS. P BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S BORUAH (r-1 to 3), MR. K SARMA (r-1 to 3)
Linked Case :
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
VERSUS
APARAJITA KALITA AND 5 ORS. B
Page No.# 3/4
------------
Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI
Advocate for : appearing for APARAJITA KALITA AND 5 ORS. B
Linked Case :
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
VERSUS
APARAJITA KALITA AND 5 ORS. B
------------
Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI
Advocate for : appearing for APARAJITA KALITA AND 5 ORS. B
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 05-08-2024
Heard Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the applicant/ insurance company. Also heard Mr. K. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4.
The applicant has taken steps upon the respondent nos. 5 and 6 through dasti service and filed affidavit to that effect and I have perused the same and notice is treated to have been served.
However, no one appears on behalf of respondent nos. 5 and 6.
This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Page No.# 4/4
proviso to section 173 of MV Act, 1988 praying for condonation of delay of 7 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 28.07.2023 passed by the learned MACT, Bajali in MAC case no. 55/2021.
The reason for not filing the connected appeal within the stipulated time has been explained in para 2 and 3 of the application.
The respondent has no objection if the delay of 7 days in filing the connected appeal is condoned.
In view of the above, the delay of 7 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
With the above, this IA stands disposed of.
The Office shall register the connected appeal and list it on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!