Md. Abdul Rashid vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 4066 Gua

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010044032017




                          THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                              Case No. : WP(C)/6281/2017

            MD. ABDUL RASHID
            S/O LT. JAMALUDDIN R/O VILL- BARANGABARI P.O. JANGALPARA, P.S.
            KHARUPETIA DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS.
            REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
            HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.

            2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

            DARRANG
            MANGALDOI
            ASSAM

            3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

            DARRANG
            MANGALDOI
            ASSAM

            4:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF KHARUPETIA POLICE STATION

            P.O. and P.S. KHARUPETIA
            DIST. DARRANG
            ASSAM
            PIN - 784115

For the Petitioner(s)         : None appears.

For the Respondent(s)         : Mr. S. Baruah, Standing Counsel
                                                                         Page No.# 2/2




                                      BEFORE
                       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                                       ORDER

Date : 29.09.2023

1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Police Authorities in carrying out the investigation pertaining to Kharupetia P.S. Case No.365/2017.

2. Taking into account the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409,

the instant writ petition is not maintainable. Be that as it may, this Court however finds it relevant to observe that from the materials on record, it transpires that the investigation has been carried out and this aspect of the matter has been duly reflected in the order dated 29.11.2017.

3. Accordingly, nothing survives in the instant writ petition for which the instant writ petition stands closed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant