Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4369 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010134602023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3601/2023
BHABANI CHETRY
S/O- LATE RATNA BAHADUR CHETRY,
R/O- VILLAGE- KARIBIL NEPALI,
P.O.- KAWNI PATHAR,
DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM,
PIN- 784176.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
THROUGH-
THE SECRETARY,
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM,
SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE CHIEF SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI- 781019.
4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE
APPOINTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3
SONITPUR
P.O.- TEZPUR
DISTRICT- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784001.
5:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE
APPOINTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BISWANATH
P.O.- BISWANATH CHARIALI
DISTRICT- BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN- 784176.
6:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
SONITPUR DISTRICT CIRCLE
TEZPUR
DISTRICT- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
O R D E R
16.10.2023
Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. SMT Chisti, learned counsel for the respondents in the Secondary Education Department, Government of Assam and Mr. P Saikia, learned Junior Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur, Assam.
Page No.# 3/3
2. The father of the petitioner Ratna Bahadur Chetry, who was working as a Grade-IV employee in the Karibil High School in the Sonitpur district, died in harness on 16.01.2016 and on his death, the petitioner submitted another application for compassionate appointment on 10.06.2016. The said application was placed before the DLC of Sonitpur district in its meeting dated 28.06.2017, but was rejected by providing that the deceased employee did not have the balance service of three years as required under Clause-1 of the Office Memorandum dated 01.06.2015.
3. We take note that by the judgment dated 30.01.2023 in WP(C) No. 1646/2021, Clause-1 of the Office Memorandum dated 01.06.2015 had been set aside, meaning thereby that there is no requirement of balance of three years of service.
4. In view of the above, the rejection of the DLC by the order dated 28.06.2017 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to be placed again before the next available DLC of Sonitpur district for a fresh consideration of the case of the petitioner as per law.
The writ petition is disposed of as indicated above.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!