Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs Page No.# 2/4
2023 Latest Caselaw 2143 Gua

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2143 Gua
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2023

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs Page No.# 2/4 on 24 May, 2023
                                                                Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010198082022




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2968/2022

         JAMUNA RABHA AND 4 ORS.
         W/O KAMESWAR RABHA
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI, PS BOKO, 781123, DIST KAMRUP,
         ASSAM

         2: KAMESWAR RABHA
          S/O LATE MUKUNDA RABHA
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
          PS BOKO
          781123
          DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM

         3: BIKASH RABHA
          S/O KAMESWAR RABHA
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
          PS BOKO
          781123
          DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM

         4: PALLABI RABHA
          D/O KAMESWAR RABHA
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
          PS BOKO
          781123
          DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM

         5: RASHMI RABHA
          D/O KAMESWAR RABHA
         RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
          PS BOKO
          781123
          DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSA

         VERSUS
                                                                  Page No.# 2/4


            RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD B
            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RELIANCE CENTRE, WALCHAND
            HIRACHAND MARG, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI 400001, AND ONE OF ITS
            BRANCH OFFICE AT BHANGAGARH, G.S ROAD, GUWAHATI



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A R AGARWALA

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K BHATTA




             Linked Case : MACApp./65/2022

            RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RELIANCE CENTRE
            WALCHAND HIRACHAND MARG
            BALLARD ESTATE
            MUMBAI 400001
            AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT BHANGAGARH
            G.S ROAD
            GUWAHATI


             VERSUS

            JAMUNA RABHA AND 8 ORS.
            W/O KAMESWAR RABHA
            RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
             PS BOKO
             781123
             DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM

            2:KAMESWAR RABHA
            S/O LATE MUKUNDA RABHA
            RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
             PS BOKO
             781123
             DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM
             3:BIKASH RABHA
            S/O KAMESWAR RABHA
            RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
             PS BOKO
                                                             Page No.# 3/4

781123
DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM
4:PALLABI RABHA
D/O KAMESWAR RABHA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
PS BOKO
781123
DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM
5:RASHMI RABHA
D/O KAMESWAR RABHA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATHALKUCHI
PS BOKO
781123
DIST KAMRUP(R) ASSAM
6:UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER
GS ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI 781005
7:MD. MUZAFFAR IKBAL
S/O BALAL UDDIN
RESIDENT OF 214
KURPANIA BASTIFITER
TOLA IMAMBARA
SUNDAY BAZAR
BOKARO
JHARKHAND
PS AND DIST BOKARO
827001
8:TAPAN BASU
S/O LATE BINOY BASU
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARENGA KHALIKHA
781135
DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
9:ANWAR ANSARI
S/O SAJJAD ANSARI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHARCH ROAD
LOHARDAGA
PO AND P LATEHAR
DIST LATEHAR
JHARKHAND
829206
------------
Advocate for : MR. K K BHATTA
Advocate for : MR. A R AGARWALA appearing for JAMUNA RABHA AND 8 ORS.
                                                                              Page No.# 4/4

                                 BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

                                        ORDER

24.05.2023

Heard Mr. A. R. Agarwala, learned counsel for the applicant.

The present application is filed with a prayer to vacate an order dated 10.02.2022 passed in I.A(Civil) No.287/2022, arising out of MACApp No.65/2022.

By an order dated 10.02.2022 in I.A(Civil) No.287/2022, it was directed that as the connected appeal was admitted, the operation of judgment and award under challenge in the MACApp shall remain stayed till disposal of the appeal and accordingly, the I.A was disposed of.

Mr. Agarwala, learned counsel submits that there was an error for the reason that the interim application could not have been disposed of and decided without issuing a notice and in absence of the claimant/respondents. He further contends that in terms of Order XLI Rule 1 Sub Rule (3), it is a pre condition that a money decree can only be stayed subject to deposit of disputed amount inasmuch as an award in MAC Case is akin to a money decree.

Be that as it may, this Court in the considered opinion, will not be in a position to reopen a disposed of miscellaneous application on the basis of the present I.A until and unless the order is reviewed by the court which passed it.

In that view of the mater, the I.A may be placed before the appropriate bench.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter