Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1971 Gua
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010138332019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3509/2019
AYESHA BEGUM AND 4 ORS
W/O LT. MATLAB UDDIN, R/O VILL. TEZPUR, P.O. KOTAMONI, P.S.
BAZARICHERRA, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM,
2: MAHMADUL HASAN
S/O LT. MATLAB UDDIN
R/O VILL. TEZPUR
P.O. KOTAMONI
P.S. BAZARICHERRA
DIST. KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
3: SHAHANAWAJ BEGUM
D/O LT. MATLAB UDDIN
R/O VILL. TEZPUR
P.O. KOTAMONI
P.S. BAZARICHERRA
DIST. KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
4: SARFUL NESSA
W/O HAJI ANJIR ALI
R/O VILL. TEZPUR
P.O. KOTAMONI
P.S. BAZARICHERRA
DIST. KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
5: HAJI ANJIR ALI
S/O LT. NASIR ALI
R/O VILL. TEZPUR
Page No.# 2/3
P.O. KOTAMONI
P.S. BAZARICHERRA
DIST. KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
(APPELANT NOS 2 AND 3 BEING MINORS ARE REP. BY THEIR MOTHER
APPELLANT NO. 1
VERSUS
MD. MAKRAM ALI AND 2 ORS
S/O MASSADAR ALI, R/O VILL. NOTRH FULBARI, P.O. PREMTOLA, DIST.
NORTH TRIPURA, TRIPURA
2:ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER
GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S DUTTA (R-2)
Linked Case :
AYESHA BEGUM AND 4 ORS
VERSUS
MD. MAKRAM ALI AND 2 ORS
------------
Advocate for :
Advocate for : appearing for MD. MAKRAM ALI AND 2 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 15-05-2023
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for Page No.# 3/3
condonation of delay of 35 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 6.7.2018, passed by the learned District Judge cum Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Karimganj, Assam in MAC Case No. 22/2015.
The cause of delay is explained at paragraphs- 3 and 4 of the connected application.
Mr.Dutta, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that he will have no objection, if delay is condoned.
Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 as well as the pleadings made in the paragraphs 3,4 and 5 of the application, this Court is of the opinion that the present applicants were prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time.
Accordingly, the delay is condoned.
IA stands disposed of.
Registry to register the connected appeal, if same is not defective and list for Admission by showing the name of Mr. S.Dutta, as the counsel for the respondent No. 2 in the cause list. Copy of appeal memo be served Mr. Dutta, learned counsel.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!