Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 224 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010159412021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5345/2021
AHMED HUSSAIN CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE AKADDAS ALI CHOUDHURY, PUMP OPERATOR (RETIRED ON
31.01.2019) UNDER PHE DIVISION, HAILAKANDI, R/O VILL- ALGAPUR
PART-I AND P.O.-KALIBARI BAGAN, DIST-HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-
788150
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING, ASSAM
CIVIL SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781006
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING
ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781036
3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
PHE
BARAK VALLEY ZONE
SILCHAR
GUNGUR
DIST- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788014
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
PHE
Page No.# 2/3
HAILAKANDI CIRCLE
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING
HAILAKANDI PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DIVISION
HAILAKANDI
DIST- HAILKANDI
ASSAM
6:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P H E
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
20.01.2023
Mr. B. Purkayashtha, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of
the petitioners is squarely covered by the order of the Apex Court dated 18.02.2022
passed in SLP(C) No. 1109/2022 (State of Gujarat & Others -Vs- Talsibhai Dhanjibhai
Patel) and judgment dated 02.09.2019 passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.
6798/2019 (lead case) (Prem Singh -Vs- Uttar Pradesh & Others) the learned counsel
submits that the petitioners having rendered more than 30 years of service as Work
Charged employees under the PHE Department with regular pay scale superannuated
from their service but they have not been given any pension. The Apex Court in the Page No.# 3/3
referred cases had directed the respondent authorities concerned to grant pensionary
benefits to those persons who are similarly situated such as the present writ
petitioners. As such, appropriate directed may be issued to the respondents to grant
the petitioners pension.
Mr. S.M. Hasan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P.N. Goswami,
learned Standing Counsel PHE Department submits that as per the instructions
received by him, the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment
rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A No. 45/2014 (State of Assam -Vs-
Upen Das & Others) and therefore the petitioners are not entitled to pension. It is
further argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the case of Upen Das
& Others (supra) the employees concerned were directed to be given the minimum
pay scale whereas, the present petitioners had been enjoying regular pay scale prior
to their superannuation and the same is not applicable.
To this submission, the learned counsel appearing for the PHE Department
submits that he may be given a few days time to examine the authorities relied upon
by the petitioners.
In view of above, matter be listed again in the 1 st week of February, 2023, on a
date to be fixed the Registry in the admission column for consideration.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!