Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10 Gua
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010268992022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8435/2022
SMT JYOTSNA MAYEE SAIKIA
W/O SRI GAUTAM PHATOWALI, R/O HOUSE NO. 18, HARI MANDIR PATH,
BYE LANE 2, MATHURA NAGAR, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SKILL, EMPLOYMENT AND
ENTREPRENEURSHIP, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF SKILL
EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:STATE ENQUIRY OFFICER
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
CUM SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
4:JOINT SECRETARY CUM PRESENTING OFFICER
DEPARTMENT OF SKILL
EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
5:DIRECTOR
EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM
REHABARI
GUWAHATI-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R CHAKRAVORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
02.01.2023
Heard Mr. S Rabha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R Dhar, learned counsel for the respondents No.1, 2, 3 and 4 being the authorities under the Department of Skill Employment & Entrepreneurship and the State Enquiry Officer, Government of Assam and Mr. SP Das, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 being the Director of Employment & Craftsmen Training, Assam.
Issue notice, returnable by six weeks.
Extra copies of the writ petition be served on the learned counsel for the respondents as indicated hereinabove within three days.
A departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner as per the show cause notice dated 30.06.2018. This writ petition is instituted on the grievance that the said disciplinary proceeding has not been brought to its logical conclusion.
The respondents to file an affidavit stating as to why the proceeding has not been brought to its logical end.
Page No.# 3/3
It is stated that otherwise the petitioner is due for consideration for promotion to the next higher cadre of Joint Director. If it is so, the respondents may follow the procedure of law provided in the judgment of the Supreme Court in paragraph 26 of Union of India and Others Vs. KV Jankiraman and Others , reported in (1991)4 SCC 109 which provides for the procedure of sealed cover method.
List after six weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!