Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 636 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2023
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010163302022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2634/2022
MUNU BORTHAKUR AND 2 ORS.
W/O LATE TULEN BORTHAKUR,
R/O R.G. BARUAH ROAD, GEETA NAGAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
VILL.- BEBEJIA,
P.O.- NAGAON, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM.
2: DIPALI BORTHAKUR
D/O LATE TULEN BORTHAKUR
R/O R.G. BARUAH ROAD
GEETA NAGAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
VILL.- BEBEJIA
P.O.- NAGAON
DIST.- NAGAON
ASSAM.
3: NAYANMONI BORTHAKUR
S/O LATE TULEN BORTHAKUR
R/O R.G. BARUAH ROAD
GEETA NAGAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
VILL.- BEBEJIA
P.O.- NAGAON
DIST.- NAGAON
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/4
VERSUS
BHOLARAM BORA AND 2 ORS.
S/O LATE MOHARAM BORA,
VILL.- GEDABORI,
P.S. JAJORI,
DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM.
2:PANKAJ BORA
S/O LATE BHELA BORA
VILL.- GEDABORI
P.S.- JAJORI
DIST.- NAGAON
ASSAM.
3:THE REGIONAL MANAGER
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
G.S. ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI- 781005
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R D MOZUMDAR (r-3)
Linked Case :
MUNU BORTHAKUR AND 2 ORS.
VERSUS
BHOLARAM BORA AND 2 ORS. B
Page No.# 3/4
------------
Advocate for : MR. A R AGARWALA
Advocate for : appearing for BHOLARAM BORA AND 2 ORS. B
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
20.02.2023.
Heard Mr. A. R. Agarwala, learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, however, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Insurance Company is present.
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 105 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 02.02.2019, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, in MACT Case No. 3195/2015. The cause of delay is explained at paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the connected application.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they will have no objection, if delay is condoned.
Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the pleadings made in the paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the connected application and after considering the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time.
Accordingly, the delay is condoned.
Page No.# 4/4
IA stands disposed of.
Registry to register the connected appeal, if same is not defective and list for Admission.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!