Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 633 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2023
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010248892022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3694/2022
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE A/25A27 ASAF ALI
ROAD, NEW DELHI 110002 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI- 7.REP.
BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER.
VERSUS
RUKIYA BEGUM AND 4 ORS.
W/O LT. HELAL UDDIN,
VILL.- BANDARKUNA (JHARALA),
P.S.- PATHERKANDI,
DIST.- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM.
2:SAHANA WAHIDA PARBEEN
MINOR DAUGHTER OF THE DECEASED SO
THEY ARE BEING REP. BY THEIR MOTHER
THAT IS
RESPONDENT NO. 1.
D/O LT. HELAL UDDIN
VILL.- BANDARKUNA (JHARALA)
P.S.- PATHERKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM.
3:BEGUM LAHARA AKHATAR
MINOR DAUGHTER OF THE DECEASED SO
THEY ARE BEING REP. BY THEIR MOTHER
THAT IS
RESPONDENT NO. 1.
Page No.# 2/4
D/O LT. HELAL UDDIN
VILL.- BANDARKUNA (JHARALA)
P.S.- PATHERKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM.
4:BEGUM TAHMIDA AKTHAR
MINOR DAUGHTER OF THE DECEASED SO
THEY ARE BEING REP. BY THEIR MOTHER
THAT IS
RESPONDENT NO. 1.
D/O LT. HELAL UDDIN
VILL.- BANDARKUNA (JHARALA)
P.S.- PATHERKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM.
5:NARAYAN PAUL
S/O LT. SUDHIR RUDRA PAUL
VILL.- MOINA
P.S.- PATHERKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case :
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD .
Page No.# 3/4
VERSUS
RUKIYA BEGUM AND 4 ORS . A
------------
Advocate for : MS. S. MOCHAHARI
Advocate for : appearing for RUKIYA BEGUM AND 4 ORS . A
Linked Case :
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD .
VERSUS
RUKIYA BEGUM AND 4 ORS . A
------------
Advocate for : MS. S. MOCHAHARI
Advocate for : appearing for RUKIYA BEGUM AND 4 ORS . A
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
ORDER
Date : 20-02-2023
Heard Mr. S.Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant along with Mr. M. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1-4.
This is an application for condonation of delay of 75 days under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 1963.
Mr. M. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondents mentions that he has not have any objection to the condonatin of 75 days in filing the appeal against Page No.# 4/4
the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2022 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident claims Tribunal, Karimganj in MAC Case No. 41 of 2016.
On hearing the submissions made by both the parties, I find that the learned counsel for the appellant has shown sufficient cause for the delay of 75 days in para 4 of his condonation application, this delay of 75 days is condoned accordingly.
In view of the above, the I.A.(Civil)/3694/2022 stands allowed and disposed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!