Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pawan Kumar Agarwala vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 1555 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1555 Gua
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Pawan Kumar Agarwala vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 11 May, 2022
                                                                Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010087282022




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/3006/2022

         PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA
         S/O LT. FAKIR CHAND AGARWALA R/O KAMAKHYA AUTO AGENCIES
         PRIVATE LTD. CHATRIBARI GUWAHATI-781001, KAMRUP M ASSAM

         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
         REP. BY FINANCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVT. OF INDIA,
         NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001

         2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
         AAYAKAR BHAWAN
          G.S. ROAD
          CHRISTIAN BASTI
          GUWAHATI-781005
         ASSAM

         3:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
         AAYAKAR BHAWAN
          G.S. ROAD
          CHRISTIAN BASTI
          GUWAHATI-781005
         ASSAM

         4:THE ADDL/JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
         AAYAKAR BHAWAN
          G.S. ROAD
          CHRISTIAN BASTI
          GUWAHATI-781005
         ASSAM

         5:THE ACIT
          CIR-2
         AAYAKAR BHAWAN
                                                                       Page No.# 2/3

            G.S. ROAD
            CHRISTIAN BASTI
            GUWAHATI-781005
            ASSAM

           6:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
            NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE
            ROOM NO. 401 2ND FLOOR
            E-RAMP
            JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM
            NEW DELHI-110103 AND ALSO ROOM NO. 356 C.R. BUILDING IP ESTATE
            NEW DELHI-11000

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D SARAF
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

                                BEFORE
           HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                      O R D E R

11.05.2022

Heard Mr. D Saraf, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Issue notice returnable on 08.06.2022. Extra copies of the writ petition be furnished to the learned counsel within three days.

3. In the instant case, the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short Act of 1961) had been signed by the authority concerned on 31.03.2021. Annexure-B page 27 of the writ petition reflects that the said notice was forwarded to the petitioner through the email method on 01.04.2021 at 7.24 a.m. The factual situation is that the notice was signed on 31.03.2021 and it was forwarded to the petitioner on 01.04.2021.

4. The Supreme Court in its judgment dated 04.05.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022 (Union of India and others -vs- Ashish Agarwal and other civil appeals) in paragraph 7 thereof had held that the benefit of the new provision Page No.# 3/3

of Section 148A of the Act of 1961 which came into effect from 01.04.2021 shall be made available even in respect of such proceedings in relation to past assessment years provided the notice under Section 148 of the Act of 1961 has been issued on or after 01.04.2021.

5. Mr. H Gupta, learned counsel for the Income Tax Department by referring to the said proposition laid down by the Supreme Court contends that the notice in the instant case was issued on 31.03.2021 i.e. before 01.04.2021 and therefore, it would be governed by the provision of Section 148 of the Act of 1961 and not under the new provision of Section 148A of the Act of 1961.

6. The expression 'issued' had been interpreted by the Supreme Court in respect of an order or a notice to the extent that a mere signing of an order or a notice, but kept in the file without being transmitted further to the person concerned to whom it ought to have been served, would have no effect under the law and its effect would come into force only upon the said notice or order being forwarded to the person concerned.

7. Admittedly, in the instant case, the notice under Section 148 of the Act of 1961 was forwarded to the petitioner only on 01.04.2021 at 7.54 a.m.

8. Mr. H Gupta, learned counsel seeks for an adjournment to examine the aforesaid aspect as to when the notice can be said to have been issued under law.

9. List the matter again on 08.06.2022.

10. Till then, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter