Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1514 Gua
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010109682019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1717/2019
CHOLAMANDALAM M S GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SHAW WALLACE BUILDING NO. 154,
2ND FLOOR, THAMBU CHETTY STREET, CHENNAI- 600001 AND NORTH
EAST STATE OFFICE AT ASTHA PLAZA, 4TH FLOOR, OPPOSITE TO
DEORAH COLLEGE, BORA SERVICE, ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-
781005.
VERSUS
MRS. RINIMA GOGOI CHANGMAI AND 4 ORS
W/O- LATE PRANAB CHANGMAI, R/O- VILL.- PALENGI, P.O. PALENGI, P.S.
DEMOW, DIST.- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM-785640.
2:SUMON CHANGMAI
S/O- LATE PRANAB CHANGMAI
R/O- VILL.- PALENGI
P.O. PALENGI
P.S. DEMOW
DIST.- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM-785640.
3:MRS. RUPADA CHANGMAI
M/O- LATE PRANAB CHANGMAI
R/O- VILL.- PALENGI
P.O. PALENGI
P.S. DEMOW
DIST.- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM-785640.
4:UJJAL JLSG
C/O- DEEP JYOTI GOGOI
VILL.- CHARAGUA GAON
P.O. CHARAGUA
P.S. DEMOW
DIST.- SIVASAGAR
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM-785640.
5:SRI DHARMESWAR KONWAR
S/O- LATE PUSPENDRA KONWAR
R/O- VILL. 1 NO. LAGUABARI GAON
P.O. RAJMAI
P.S. DEMOW
DIST.- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM- 785662
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N BORUAH (R5)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 09-05-2022
Heard Mr. K. K. Bhatta, learned counsel for the applicant/Insurance Company.
None has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties though notice on opposite parties No. 1 to 5 are indicated to have been served vide Office Note, dated 09.03.2022.
This is an application preferred by the applicant/Insurance Company under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 27 days, in preferring the connected appeal which is directed against the judgment & award, dated 10.10.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT No. 1, Kamrup, Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 600/2015.
Page No.# 3/3
The reasons for the delay in not preferring the connected MAC. appeal within the stipulated time have been explained in paragraphs No. 6 & 7 of the accompanying application stating that the delay has occurred due to the official procedure that was required to be followed in the office of the applicant/ Insurance Company while processing the file for preferring the appeal.
On perusal of the explanation provided in paragraphs No. 6 & 7 of the accompanying application, I am satisfied that there was no laches and negligence on the part of the applicant/ Insurance Company and the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected MAC. appeal within the stipulated time period.
In view of the above, the delay of 27 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
The interlocutory application stands allowed and accordingly stands disposed of.
Registry shall register the connected appeal and list it for admission hearing in due course.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!