Mukul Das @ Sonti Das vs The State Of Assam
2021 Latest Caselaw 3100 Gua

                                                                             Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010185872021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : Crl.A./189/2021

            MUKUL DAS @ SONTI DAS
            S/O LATE MOHAN DAS, R/O KAITHALKUCHI (LAUARAPARA), P.O.-
            KAITHALKUCHI, P.S.-BELSOR, DIST- NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN-781370



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. T DEURI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




                                  BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

                                          ORDER

Date : 24-11-2021 Suman Shyam, J

Heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the appellant. We have also heard Ms. B.

Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. Assam appearing for the State.

This appeal against conviction is directed against the judgment and order dated 04-

Page No.# 2/2

10-2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nalbari in connection with Sessions Case

No. 62/2012 convicting the appellant under Sections 147/ 447/ 302/ 323 IPC and

sentencing him to inter alia undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine with default

stipulation.

We have perused the grounds taken in the memo of appeal.

Admit the appeal.

Issue notice returnable in 04 weeks.

Ms. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. Assam has accepted notice on behalf of the State/

respondent No. 1.

Mr. Deuri submits that the informant/ respondent No. 2 in this case had expired

during the trial. As such, there is no need to serve notice upon the informant in this case.

In view of the above, this appeal is deemed to be ready as regards service.

Office to list this appeal immediately upon receipt of the LCR along with Crl. A. No.

180/2021 and Crl. A. No. 181/2021 which are stated to be analogous to this appeal.

                           JUDGE                      JUDGE
GS




Comparing Assistant