Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nilotpol Das vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1069 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1069 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Nilotpol Das vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 19 March, 2021
                                                                 Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010047622021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/1823/2021

         NILOTPOL DAS
         S/O LATE CHAMPAK CHANDRA DAS,
         R/O JYOTINAGAR, WARD NO. 6, MANGALDAI TOWN, PO AND PS
         MANGALDAI, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM, 780125

         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
         IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06

         2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
         ASSAM IRRIGATION CHANDMARI
          GUWAHATI 03

         3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
          MANGALDAI DIVISION (IRRIGATION ) MANGALDAI
          PO AND PS MANGALDAI
          DIST DARRANG
         ASSAM 784125

         4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC)
          DARRANG
          REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          DARRANG
          MANGALDAI
         ASSAM 784125

         5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          DARRANG
          MANGALDAI
          DIST DARRANG
         ASSAM 78412
                                                                                  Page No.# 2/3

Advocate for the Petitioner    : MR M AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM




                                  BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                          ORDER

Date : 19.03.2021

Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner's father died in harness on 07.03.2016, while working as a Helper (Grade-IV) employee in the office of the Executive Engineer, Mangaldoi Division (Irrigation). The petitioner thereafter submitted an application for compassionate appointment, which was rejected by the District Level Committee (DLC) in its meeting held on 26.08.2016, for want of vacancy.

2. The petitioner's counsel submits that subsequent to the rejection of the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment by the DLC in its meeting held on 26.08.2016, the concerned Department has again sent another proposal for compassionate appointment of the petitioner to the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Darrang vide letter dated 06.12.2019 issued by the Executive Engineer, Mangaldoi Division (Irrigation). However, the same has not been placed before the DLC for its consideration. He submits that a direction should be issued to the DLC to consider the petitioner's application.

3. Mr. N. Upadhay, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. D. Doley, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 submit that once the application of the petitioner has been rejected by the DLC on account of want of vacancy, the petitioner's case for compassionate appointment cannot be considered again. They further submit that the submission of the petitioner's counsel that the Department has sent the petitioner's case for compassionate appointment again, is not supported by the letter dated 06.12.2019 issued by the Executive Engineer, Mangaldoi Division Page No.# 3/3

(Irrigation), as it states that there is no vacant post for the 5% quota for appointment for die-in-harness scheme at present.

4. I have heard the counsels for the parties.

5. Guideline No. 10 of the judgment of this Court in the case of Achyut Ranjan Das and others -Vs- State of Assam, reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 states as follows:-

"X) If the applications of eligible candidates remain pending and cannot be considered due to want of vacancies for a period of 2 (two) years from the date of making such applications, as such applications will require no further consideration and must be understood to have spent their force."

The above clearly shows that if there are no vacancies for the period the application was valid, i.e. for a period of 2 (two) years, the application losses its force.

6. Further, the letter dated 06.12.2019 issued by the Executive Engineer, Mangaldai Division (Irrigation) and addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Darrang, Mangaldai clearly shows that there is no vacant post on 5% quata for appointment on die-in-harness scheme at present.

7. In view of the fact that there is no challenge to the DLC meeting minutes by which the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment had been rejected on 26.08.2016, this writ petition, being devoid of any merit, is herby dismissed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter