Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Guttu And Company And Anr vs Md. Sale Ahmed And 4 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1645 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1645 Gua
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2021

Gauhati High Court
M/S Guttu And Company And Anr vs Md. Sale Ahmed And 4 Ors on 12 July, 2021
                                                               Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010071382021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : RSA/65/2021

         M/S GUTTU AND COMPANY AND ANR.
         A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES
         ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT JANIGANJ BAZAR, SILCHAR IN THE
         DISTRICT OF CACHAR, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         MD. SALE AHMED AND 4 ORS.
         S/O HAJI ABDUL MANAF, HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT VILLAGE
         DOLUGANG UNDER HARINAGAR G.P. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
         NAPITCHERRA UNDER KALINAGAR JUNGLE BLOCK 2, PO- KALINAGAR,
         DIST. KARIMGANJ

         2:KALAM UDDIN
          S/O HAJI ABDUL MANAF
          HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT VILLAGE DOLUGANG UNDER
         HARINAGAR G.P. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAPITCHERRA UNDER
         KALINAGAR JUNGLE BLOCK 2
          PO- KALINAGAR
          DIST. KARIMGANJ

         3:MONIR UDDIN
          S/O HAJI ABDUL MANAF
          HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT VILLAGE DOLUGANG UNDER
         HARINAGAR G.P. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAPITCHERRA UNDER
         KALINAGAR JUNGLE BLOCK 2
          PO- KALINAGAR
          DIST. KARIMGANJ

         4:MOJIR UDDIN
          S/O HAJI ABDUL MANAF
          HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT VILLAGE DOLUGANG UNDER
                                                                                     Page No.# 2/3

               HARINAGAR G.P. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAPITCHERRA UNDER
               KALINAGAR JUNGLE BLOCK 2
               PO- KALINAGAR
               DIST. KARIMGANJ

               5:AMIR UDDIN
                S/O HAJI ABDUL MANAF
                HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT VILLAGE DOLUGANG UNDER
               HARINAGAR G.P. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAPITCHERRA UNDER
               KALINAGAR JUNGLE BLOCK 2
                PO- KALINAGAR
                DIST. KARIMGAN

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MR G SAHEWALLA

Advocate for the Respondent :




                                      BEFORE
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

                                             ORDER

Date : --

Heard Mr. G.N. Sahewala, assisted by Mr. M. Sahewala, learned counsel for the appellant. This an second appeal u/s 100 of the CPC.

The appeal is admitted for hearing upon the following substantial question of law:

1. Whether the learned appellant court below was correct in deciding issue no. 3 affirmative holding State a of Assam as a necessary party to the suit although the defendant respondents failed to prove acquisition of the suit land as ceiling surplus and also failed to show any settlement as per provisions of the Assam Fixation of Ceiling and Land Holdings Act 1956 for the alleged tenants?

2. Whether the appellate court below was right in holding that inspite of being admitted by the defendants/respondents regarding the sale of the Kalinagar Tea Estate By Bharat Samiti Limited to Sriram Tea Company, the Plaintiff must prove the sale accordingly reversing the judgment of the trial Court?

3. Whether the learned appellate court below was right in holding that the sale deed i.e Page No.# 3/3

exhibit 3 having not contained the boundary description or dag no/pata no of the land of the plaintiff's right cannot be declared inspite of the admission the defendant respondent that land of dag no. 5 is a part of Kalinagar Tea Estate originally belonging to Bharat Samiti Limited from whom the predecessor in interest of the respondents took lease from Bharat Samiti Ltd and as such the impugned judgment and decree are liable to be set aside and quashed.

Issue notice to the respondents. Appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by registered post with A/D as well as by usual process.

Call for the LCR.

List the matter after four weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter