Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4 Gua
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010163112020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./109/2020
ASHOK KR DEV CHOUDHURY AND 3 ORS.
S/O- LATE BHABESH CHANDRA DEV CHOUDHURY, ASSISTANT
CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, NORTH KAMRUP DIVISION, RANGIA,
ASSAM.
2: DIBAKOR DAS
S/O- LATE NIKUNJA BEHARI DAS
ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
DHANSIRI FOREST DIVISION
UDALGURI
BTAD.
3: MUSTAFA ALI AHMED
S/O- LATE PHUKAN ALI
ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
GUWAHATI
SF DIVISION
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI-781029
ASSAM.
4: KANAK BAISHYA
S/O- LATE UTCHAB BAISHYA
ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
KAMRUP EAST DIVISION
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
781006.
Page No.# 2/3
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PERSONAL (B) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
4:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HOF
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI- 781037.
5:THE SECRETARY
ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
KHANAPARA
JAWAHARNAGAR
GUWAHATI- 781022.
6:KUSHAL KOWAR DEKA
S/O- LATE LOKNATH DEKA
ZOO ROAD NARENGI ROAD
NO. 2 MATGHARIA
P.O. AND P.S. NOONMATI
PIN- 781020
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
7:SAHADAT ALI
S/O- LATE MAHIM UDDIN AHMED
29 LNB PATH
HATIGAON
P.O. AND P.S. HATIGAON
PIN- 781038
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
04.01.2021
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the respondent no. 6 as well as Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned counsel for the Forest Department. Also heard Mr. K. Konwar, learned counsel for the APSC.
This review petition is instituted on the ground that while the judgment dated 19.10.2020 in WP(C) No. 4294/2020 was passed, even after due diligence it could not be brought before the court that the present writ petitioners were necessary parties in the said proceeding. The second ground taken is that the notification dated 11.02.2020 which was relied upon for passing the judgment otherwise cannot be the basis for the judgment inasmuch as the said notification is in conflict with the statutory provisions governing the core issues.
On the next date, the two issues will be heard.
List on 08.01.2021.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!