Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 187 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010054312019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/900/2019
SAJEDA BEGUM AND 3 ORS
W/O- LATE MAKIM UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- JAGIRPAM, P.S. AND DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781316
2: SAFIKUR RAHMAN
S/O- LATE MAKIM UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- JAGIRPAM
P.S. AND DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781316
3: SAHIDUR RAHMAN
S/O- LATE MAKIM UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- JAGIRPAM
P.S. AND DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781316
4: MEBTAFUL ZANNAT
D/O- LATE MAKIM UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- JAGIRPAM
P.S. AND DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781316
5: SAJID IKBAL
S/O- LATE MAKIM UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- JAGIRPAM
P.S. AND DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 78131
VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3
SRI MANOJ KUMAR AND 2 ORS
S/O- JASWANTA SINGH
R/O- VILL.- DHIKOLI, P.S.- CHANDI NAGAR, DIST.- BAGPATH (U.P.), PIN-
250001 (OWNER OF THE TRUCK BEARING REGD. NO. UP-17/T-3307).
2:SRI BIR SINGH
S/O- JASWANTA SINGH
R/O- VILL.- DHIKOLI
P.S.- CHANDI NAGAR
DIST.- BAGPATH (U.P.)
PIN- 250001 (DRIVER OF THE TRUCK BEARING REGD. NO. UP-17/T-3307).
3:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
BONGAIGAON DIVISIONAL OFFICE
P.S. AND DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783380 (INSURER OF THE TRUCK BEARING REGD. NO. UP017/T-3307)
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. P BORA (R1, R2)
Linked Case :
SAJEDA BEGUM AND 4 ORS
VERSUS
SRI MANOJ KUMAR AND 2 ORS
------------
Advocate for :
Advocate for : appearing for SRI MANOJ KUMAR AND 2 ORS
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 21-01-2021
Heard Mr. S. A. Hussain, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicants.
None has appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2, though the names of the learned counsels representing the respondents No. 1 & 2, have been shown in the Cause List.
Office Note, dated 27.04.2020, indicates that AD card in respect of respondent No. 3 have been received back after causing service of notice on the said respondent No. 3 and accordingly, service of notice on respondent No. 3 is deemed to be complete.
This is an application preferred by the applicant, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 88 days, in preferring the connected appeal, against the judgment & order, dated 29.05.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta, Assam, in MAC Case No. 92/2013.
The reasons for delay in filing the connected appeal have been explained in paragraphs No. 3 & 4 of the accompanying application.
On perusal of the explanation provided in paragraphs No. 3 & 4 of this interlocutory application; I am satisfied that the applicants were prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected MAC. Appeal within the stipulated time and accordingly, the delay of 88 days in filing the connected appeal, be condoned. It is hereby accordingly ordered.
The interlocutory application stands allowed and accordingly stands disposed of.
Registry shall register the connected appeal and list it accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!