Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pranati Devi vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1929 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1929 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Pranati Devi vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 20 August, 2021
                                                                       Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010112232021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/3851/2021

            PRANATI DEVI
            W/O MR. BIPIN NATH, R/O VILL-BALIKHUTI, P.O.-GHOTUA, PIN-784149,
            DIST-SONITPUR, ASSAM



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
            TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
            GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPARTMENT,
            DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06

            2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
            ASSAM
             KAHILIPARA
             GUWAHATI-19

            3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
             SONITPUR DISTRICT CIRCLE
            TEZPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN-781301

            4:BISWAJIT BORO
             S/O SRI KANAK CH. BORO
             R/O VILL-MEGHAIATI
             P.O.-ULUBARI
             DIST-SONITPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN-78414

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR H TALUKDAR
                                                                Page No.# 2/4

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.




            Linked Case : WP(C)/4987/2019

           BISWAJIT BORO
           S/O- SRI KANAK CH. BORO
           R/O- VILL- MEGHAIATI
           P.O. ULUBARI
           DIST- SONITPUR
           ASSAM
           PIN- 784149


            VERSUS

           THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
           REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
           EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT.
           DISPUR
           GHY-6

           2:THE STATE SELECTION BOARD
           THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN
            i.e. THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
            EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT.
            DISPUR
            GHY-6
            3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
           ASSAM
            KAHILIPARA
            GHY-19
            4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
           SONITPUR DISTRICT CIRCLE

           TEZPUR ASSAM-784001
           5:PRANATI DEVI
           ASSTT. TEACHER OF JUGAL HIGH SCHOOL
           VILL- BAMUNPUKHURI
           P.O. GHOTUA
           DIST- SONITPUR
           ASSAM PIN- 784149
           ------------
           Advocate for : MR. S C BISWAS
           Advocate for : SC
                                                                        Page No.# 3/4

            EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.




                           BEFORE
      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                     ORDER

20.08.2021

Both the writ petitioner and the respondent No.4 herein had participated in the selection process for appointment of a regular headmaster in the Jugal High School in the Sonitpur district. This writ petition is instituted by the petitioner Pranati Devi with the grievance that the result of the selection process has not yet been declared and therefore, no further process for appointment of the headmaster has been carried forward.

2. It was brought to our notice when the matter was taken up on 18.08.2021 that the respondent No.4 Biswajit Boro had instituted WP(C)No.4987/2019 wherein the provisions of Rule 14(2) of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation of Service) Rules, 2003 (For short, the Rules of 2003) has been assailed.

3. Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent Secondary Education Department states that the issue as regards the validity of Rule 14(2) of the Rules of 2003 had already been decided in WP(C)No.1580/2017 by the judgment dated 16.08.2019.

4. Be that as it may, the respondents in the Secondary Education Department Page No.# 4/4

are taking the stand that the reliefs sought for in this writ petition for declaration of the results cannot be granted as because of the pendency of WP(C)No.4987/2019. WP(C)No.4987/2019 on the other hand, involves the issue of validity of Rule 14(2) of the Rules of 2003 and it being a matter where the provisions of a statutory rule has been assailed, it would be for the Division Bench to take up such issue. Whether or not the validity of Rule 14(2) of the Rules of 2003 had already been decided in another writ petition being WP(C)No.1580/2017 and whether WP(C)No.4987/2019 would also be covered by such a decision is the perogative of the Division Bench to decide upon.

5. Considering the matter in its entirety, the Registry is requested to place WP(C)No.3851/2021 along with WP(C)No.4987/2019 before the Division Bench for further consideration.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter