Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhinay Kumar vs State( Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)
2026 Latest Caselaw 1556 Del

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1556 Del
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Abhinay Kumar vs State( Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 18 March, 2026

                          $~78
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                            Date of Decision: 18.03.2026
                          +      BAIL APPLN. 4473/2024 & CRL.M.(BAIL)                            2072/2024,
                                 CRL.M.A. 36652/2024 & 12666/2025

                                 ABHINAY KUMAR                                         .....Petitioner
                                                       Through:   Mr. Ankur Yadav, Advocate (through
                                                                  videoconferencing)
                                                       versus

                                 STATE( GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)                        .....Respondent
                                                       Through:   Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State
                                                                  with SI Satender Kumar and Inspector
                                                                  Abhijeet Singh.


                                 CORAM:            JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA


                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 387/2024 of PS Geeta Colony for offence under Section 406/420/120B/34 IPC.

1.1 This anticipatory bail application was listed for first hearing on 05.12.2024 before the predecessor bench and after hearing both sides, the learned predecessor bench directed that subject to his joining investigation, the accused/applicant shall not be arrested till next date. That interim

BAIL APPLICATION 4473/2024 Page 1 of 4 pages

GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45

ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa

Digitally Signed , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.18 18:16:17 -07'00'

By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:18.03.2026 18:18:10 protection continued on date to date basis till date. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.

1.2 Today is the first hearing before this bench. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State.

2. Briefly stated, prosecution case is as follows. In the FIR, the complainant de facto alleged that he was approached by the accused/applicant and one Lalit Jain in January 2024 with an offer for investment in their company namely M/s Clean Earth Innovations Pvt. Ltd., which is dealing in scrap and manufacture of environment friendly products. The accused/applicant and his associate assured to transfer to the complainant de facto 2% shares in the company for investment of Rs. 2 crores. The accused/applicant and his associate persuaded the complainant de facto after showing him financial health status of the company. Accordingly, the complainant de facto paid cash amount in three instalments, viz., Rs.44.6 lakhs on 11.01.2024 at Chacha Nehru Hospital, Geeta Colony; Rs.25.75 lakhs on 12.01.2024 and Rs.25 lakhs on 24.02.2025 at Karol Bagh. The said entire amount was paid in cash against receipts issued by the accused/applicant and his associate. But the accused persons neither transferred 2% shares in their company nor returned the amount. Hence, according to the complainant de facto, he was cheated by the accused persons.

3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the entire case set

BAIL APPLICATION 4473/2024 Page 2 of 4 pages

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2026.03.18 18:14:41 -07'00'

By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:18.03.2026 18:18:10 up by the complainant de facto is false and that the accused/applicant never issued any receipt to the complainant de facto. It is further contended that during the period of interim protection from arrest, the accused/applicant joined investigation whenever directed by the IO and his specimen signatures have already been taken for being compared with the alleged receipts. It is also contended that there is no evidence collected to show any cash money drawn by the complainant de facto from his bank account, to be handed over to the accused persons.

4. Learned APP for State submits that the accused/applicant be directed to join investigation, in case he is granted anticipatory bail. However, learned APP admits that specimen signatures of the accused/applicant have already been obtained by the IO.

5. In order to ascertain if the complainant de facto paid any money to the accused persons towards purchase of 2% shares of the company of the accused persons, the IO was directed to show the said cash receipts. Those receipts are completely silent about any purchase of shares. Those receipts are printed material on letter head, bearing signatures alleged to be of the accused/applicant. The unusual space between the printed material and the signatures prima facie raises a suspicion. Even the learned Court of Sessions while dealing with anticipatory bail application of the accused/applicant recorded such observation.

6. At this stage, during dictation of the order, learned APP also submits

BAIL APPLICATION 4473/2024 Page 3 of 4 pages

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,

KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.18 18:14:27 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:18.03.2026 18:18:10 that as per evidence collected by the IO, on the date of payment of first instalment, the accused/applicant was not a Director in the said company. But on this aspect, as mentioned above, prima facie, the material on record is not of the nature that the accused/applicant be deprived of liberty.

7. Considering the overall circumstances, the application is allowed and in the event of his arrest, the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned. Pending applications stand disposed of.

8. Of course, on the above aspects, the learned trial court shall take independent view at the final stage on the basis of evidence adduced during trial.

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.18 18:14:01 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) MARCH 18, 2026/ry

BAIL APPLICATION 4473/2024 Page 4 of 4 pages

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter