Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarabjeet Singh Narula & Anr vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr
2026 Latest Caselaw 1451 Del

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1451 Del
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Sarabjeet Singh Narula & Anr vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 13 March, 2026

Author: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Bench: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
                 $~45
                 *        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                 +                           W.P.(C) 3257/2026
                                                                  Date of Decision: 13.03.2026
                          IN THE MATTER OF:

                          SARABJEET SINGH NARULA & ANR.                        .....Petitioners
                                             Through:     Mr. Manmohan Singh Narula with
                                                          Mr. Amit Yadav, Advocates.

                                             versus

                          GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondents
                                      Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for
                                               GNCTD.

                 CORAM:
                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
                                             JUDGEMENT

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3257/2026

3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The petitioners seek for a direction to the Govt. Of NCT of Delhi to allow the petitioners to appear virtually for the purpose of registration of their marriage under the provisions of Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners places reliance on the decision passed by this Court in the case of Reena Chadha & Anr. v. Govt. Of NCT

Signed By:NEHA CHOPRA Signed Signing Date:17.03.2026 By:PURUSHAINDRA 14:10:11 KUMAR KAURAV of Delhi1. Paragraph no. 27 of the said decision is extracted as under:

"27. However, keeping in view the peculiar facts of this case, the following specific directions are issued qua the petitioners -

a) The petitioners are permitted to submit their application for registration of marriage, through their counsel/Power of Attorney Holder in physical form before the SDM Kishan Ganj, Delhi, alongwith copies of all supporting documents duly notarized, either by the notary public in US, where they are presently residing, or by the notary public in Delhi.

b) The respondent will allow the "personal appearance" of the Petitioners for the purpose of Clause 4 (d) and (e) & Form A of The Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage), 2014 through Video Conferencing.

c) The two witnesses, as required under the Registration Order will appear physically before the Registering Authority alongwith their original ID proofs, on the date as notified by the authority.

d) The respondent will, thereafter, expeditiously register the petitioners' marriage, and issue the Marriage Registration Certificate within a period of two weeks' from the date of receipt of the application made by the petitioners."

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents however submits that the signatures of the petitioners will have to be verified by the witness.

5. The direction contained in Reena Chadha deals with almost similar circumstances. The Court, therefore, deems it appropriate to dispose of the instant petition with the following directions:

(i) Let the petitioners to submit their application for registration of marriage through their counsel/Power of Attorney Holder in physical form before the concerned SDM. They shall also enclose all supporting documents duly notarised either by the notary public in the country where the petitioners are residing or by the notary public in Delhi;

                 (ii)      The petitioners shall appear through video conferencing. Let the said


                     WP(C) 6653/2021


Signed By:NEHA CHOPRA                                                                Signed
Signing Date:17.03.2026                                                              By:PURUSHAINDRA
14:10:11
                                                                                     KUMAR KAURAV

permission be granted by the concerned SDM subject to convenience of his office and the concerned parties;

(iii) Let two witnesses to appear in person before the concerned SDM to verify the signatures and other formalities being carried out by the petitioners. Let these two witnesses to also identify the presence of the petitioners who would be appearing through video conferencing. The witnesses who would be identifying the petitioners' physical presence on video conferencing shall also file specific affidavit regarding the said verification; and

(iv) The concerned SDM, thereafter, to consider the petitioners' application with due expedition.

6. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.




                                                    PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
                 MARCH 13, 2026
                 tr





Signed By:NEHA CHOPRA                                                         Signed
Signing Date:17.03.2026                                                       By:PURUSHAINDRA
14:10:11
                                                                              KUMAR KAURAV
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter