Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bala Sharma Ors vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) & Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 5030 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5030 Del
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2025

Delhi High Court

Bala Sharma Ors vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) & Anr on 26 September, 2025

                          $~44
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                       Date of decision: 26.09.2025
                          +        W.P. (CRL) 3193/2025
                                    BALA SHARMA ORS.                          .....Petitioners
                                                     Through:     Mr. Naresh Kumar Joshi, Ms.
                                                                  Shruti Aggarwal, Advs.
                                                     versus
                                   STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR.               .....Respondents
                                                     Through:     Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC
                                                                  with     SI    Nikhlesh,    PS
                                                                  Shakarpur.
                                                                  Ms. Riya Kumar Verma, Adv.
                                                                  for R-2 with R-2 in person.

                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                               JUDGMENT(ORAL)

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 971/2023, dated 30.12.2023, registered at P.S Shakarpur, Delhi under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. Both parties are relatives. As per allegations made in the FIR, petitioners using forged documents executed a relinquishment deed in regards to property jointly owned by respondent no. 2 and his late

brother/husband of petitioner no. 1, bearing no. Khasra No. 297/193, Shakarpur, Delhi -110092. Petitioners further trespassed, made some alterations and also restrained respondent no. 2 from entering the abovementioned property. FIR No. 971/2023 was lodged at instance of Respondent no. 2 under sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC against the petitioners.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement/Compromise Deed 23.08.2025. It is submitted that petitioners have paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lacs only) to respondent no. 2, copy of the same has been annexed as Annexure A-

4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Nikhlesh, from PS Shakarpur.

5. Respondent no. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioner without any force, fear, coercion and he has received the total settlement amount and has no objection if the FIR No. 971/2023 is quashed against the petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 971/2023 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675.

9. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

10. The petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 971/2023, dated 30.12.2023, registered at P.S Shakarpur, Delhi under section

420/467/468/471/120B IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

11. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

12. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J September 26, 2025 SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter