Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 396 Del
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025
$~66
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 14.05.2025
+ BAIL APPLN. 1840/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14907/2025
DEEPAK TYAGI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Mr. Rajendra
Singh and Mr. Paras Sharma,
Advocates.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State
with SI Mahaveer and SI Manish, PS
Daryaganj.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 585/2023 of PS Daryaganj for offences under Section 392/395/397/412/120B/182/ 211/212/109/34 IPC. The earlier bail application of the accused/applicant was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the accused/applicant filed fresh bail application before the learned Trial Court which was dismissed vide order dated 09.05.2025. Hence, the present application.
2. Learned APP accepts notice and assisted by the Investigating Officer/SI Mahaveer, fairly concedes that the accused/applicant deserves parity with the co-accused Asif Khan, who was granted regular bail by this court vide detailed order dated 27.03.2025.
BAIL APPLN. 1840/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages
GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH
KATHPALIA
KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.14 17:53:46
+05'30'
By:RAHUL YADAV
Signing Date:14.05.2025
18:34:04
3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he conspired in commission of dacoity involving an amount of Rs. 90,00,000/-. The accused/applicant was not personally involved in the actual act of dacoity. However, out of the allegedly looted money, a sum of Rs. 19,66,000/- was allegedly recovered from his house. Unlike co-accused Asif Khan, the accused/applicant was not even an employee of the victim Mayank Jain.
4. Further, as discussed at length in bail order dated 27.03.2025 pertaining to co-accused Asif Khan, the manner of arrests of the accused persons prima facie does not inspire confidence.
5. It is under these circumstances that learned APP has fairly opted not to oppose this bail application.
6. The bail application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.
7. Copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant. Pending application stands disposed of.
GIRISH Digitally signed by
GIRISH KATHPALIA
KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.14 17:54:05
+05'30'
GIRISH KATHPALIA
(JUDGE)
MAY 14, 2025/DR
BAIL APPLN. 1840/2025 Page 2 of 2 pages
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!