S Nagamony vs M/S Axis Bank Limited Represented By Its ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3029 Del

Delhi High Court

S Nagamony vs M/S Axis Bank Limited Represented By Its ... on 26 March, 2025

                          $~29
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                  Date of Decision: 26th March, 2025
                          +     CM(M) 2591/2024
                                S NAGAMONY                                                 ....Petitioner
                                                    Through:      Mr. S. Mahendran, Advocate.

                                                    versus

                                M/S AXIS BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH
                                MANAGER                                   .....Respondent
                                              Through: Mr. Anupam Singh and Ms. Nika
                                                        Tiwari, Advocates for Axis Bank Ltd.
                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
                                              J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 26.02.2024 passed by learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short „NCDRC‟) in Appeal No. 114/2024.

2. The above matter was filed before learned NCDRC impugning order dated 24.03.2023 passed by Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Madurai in Complaint No.18/2020.

3. Since the cause of action pertaining to the present subject matter has arisen within the jurisdiction of other High Court, relying upon judgment dated 04.03.2024 passed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 4205, learned counsel for petitioner now prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High

Court.

4. This Court has gone through the above said order wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has, very categorically, observed that merely because NCDRC, having seat in Delhi, had allowed petition, the jurisdiction would not vest with Delhi High Court and observing that since the cause of action had arisen in Kolkata and the matter had been dealt with by the State Commission of West Bengal, it was held that the jurisdiction of High Court of Calcutta should have been invoked.

5. Moreover, this Court has already vide order dated 12.09.2024 passed in General Manager, Punjab National Bank and Others vs. Rohit Malhotra:

(2024) SCC OnLine Del 6415 observed that in view of Siddhartha S Mookerjee (supra), any such petitioner should go to the "jurisdictional High Court".

6. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty, as prayed for, is granted.

7. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion, whatsoever, over the merits of the case.

(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE MARCH 26, 2025 st/SS