Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saurav Kumar And Ors vs Council Of Scientific And Industrial ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2869 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2869 Del
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025

Delhi High Court

Saurav Kumar And Ors vs Council Of Scientific And Industrial ... on 19 March, 2025

Author: Navin Chawla
Bench: Navin Chawla
                  $~104
                  *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                            Date of decision: 19.03.2025

                  +      W.P.(C) 90/2016
                         SAURAV KUMAR AND ORS                      .....Petitioners
                                         Through: Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior
                                                  Advocate with Mr. Pranav
                                                  Sachdeva, Mr.Ritik Chatrath
                                                  Kapur, Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj and
                                                  Mr. Abhay Nair, Advs.

                                             versus

                         COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
                                                                .....Respondent
                                       Through: Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ms.
                                                Archana Sharma, Mr. Devesh
                                                Maurya, Mr. Ravi Kumar, Mr.
                                                Sukhamrit, Advs.
                                                Mr. Arun Sanwal, Adv.

                         CORAM:
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
                         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

                  NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

REVIEW PET. 11/2022 & CM APPL. 2147/2022, CM APPL.

1. By the present review petition, the petitioner seeks a review of the Judgment dated 03.03.2016 passed by this Court in the above mentioned writ petition. Applications have also been filed seeking permission to file the instant review petition and seeking condonation of delay in filing of the same.

2. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits

that the petitioners in the writ petition are not identically situated to the petitioners in the review petition; the writ petitioners were appointed under the 'Quick Hire Scheme' floated by the respondent, whereas the review petitioners have been appointed against the amended Rules for Recruitment and Assessment Promotion of CSIR Scientists applicable with effect from 01.06.2011. She submits that, therefore, the Judgment dated 03.03.2016 is not applicable to the review petitioners.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, has drawn our attention to the Order dated 04.05.2016 passed by this Court in CM APPL. Nos. 15769-15770/2016, to contend that the plea raised by the review petitioners can be taken in their own independent proceedings, and whether the Judgment dated 03.03.2016 can be applied to them has to be determined in those proceedings.

4. We find merit in the contention raised by the learned counsel for the respondent.

5. This Court, in its Order dated 04.05.2016, has already clarified this position by observing as under:-

"CM Nos. 15769-15770/2016 We do not think any clarification or order is required. The legal ratio decided will be binding.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that their facts and the regulations applicable are different and, therefore, the ratio would not be applicable. This is a contention which the applicants may raise before the tribunal and it will be for the tribunal to decide whether the legal ratio vide judgment dated 3rd March, 2016 will be applicable or not. We would not comment and make any observation

The applications are accordingly disposed of as misconceived."

6. We, therefore, reiterate that all contentions of the review petitioners are open to be determined in their own independent proceedings, and the question of applicability of the Judgment dated 03.03.2016 shall be determined in those proceedings.

7. The review petition and the applications are, accordingly, disposed of.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

RENU BHATNAGAR, J MARCH 19, 2025 Ab/sc/SJ Click here to check corrigendum, if any

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter