Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hari Singh vs Kitabo Devi
2025 Latest Caselaw 6382 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6382 Del
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2025

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Hari Singh vs Kitabo Devi on 15 December, 2025

                          $~1
                          *        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                   Date of Decision: 15th December, 2025
                          +        RFA 403/2015
                                   HARI SINGH                                           .....Appellant
                                                   Through:     Mr. G.D. Parashar, Ms. Shanta
                                                                Parashar, Mr. Satish Vijay, Mr. Lalit
                                                                Bhargava, Mr. Aryan Yadav and Ms.
                                                                Ritika Yadav, Advs.

                                                   versus

                                   KITABO DEVI                                      .....Respondent
                                                   Through:     Mr. A.K. Pandey, Adv. with Ms.
                                                                Ayushi Pandey, Adv.
                                                                M: 9312982075
                                                                Email: [email protected]

                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
                                   MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

1. The present appeal has been filed seeking setting aside of the judgment and decree dated 23rd March, 2015, passed by the Additional District Judge ("ADJ")-02, South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Suit No. 885/2012, titled as "Sh. Hari Singh Versus Smt. Kitabo Devi".

2. The impugned judgment emanates from a suit for specific performance filed on behalf of the appellant with respect to property bearing No. B-155, Village Matiyala, colony known as Mansa Ram Park, Uttam Nagar, Delhi- 110059.

3. As recorded in the last order dated 15th November, 2025, the

following had transpired between the parties:

"xxx xxx xxx

3. During the course of the arguments, learned counsel appearing for the appellant pleaded that the appellant has paid a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/- to the respondent. However, during the course of cross- examination of the respondent-Ms. Kitabo Devi, she has admitted to payment of only Rs. 2,50,000/-. The other amounts, as alleged to have been paid to the respondent, have been denied by the respondent by denying the signatures on the receipts.

4. The evidence on record shows that the said signatures of the respondent on the alleged receipts for further payments have not been proved before the learned Trial Court.

5. Accordingly, this Court specifically put to the counsel for the respondent that since the respondent has already admitted to receipt of payment of Rs. 2,50,000/-, which amount was received in the year 2012, as to whether the respondent was ready to return the admitted amount.

6. Further, this Court was also of the view that since the said amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- was received by the respondent in the year 2012, a lump sum amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- would be paid back to the appellant herein.

7. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has taken instructions from husband of the respondent, i.e., Mr. Kapoor Singh, who is present in Court and upon such instructions, has stated that the respondent shall return an amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the appellant. However, he seeks some time for doing the needful. xxx xxx xxx"

(Emphasis Supplied)

4. Thus, in the aforesaid terms, during the course of hearing, settlement was reached between the parties with regard to return of Rs. 3 Lacs by the respondent to the appellant, as full and final settlement of all the disputes between the parties.

5. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has brought before this Court a Demand Draft No. 529938 dated 11th December, 2025 for a sum of Rs. 3 Lacs drawn on Punjab National Bank, Uttam Nagar, New

Delhi in favour of Hari Singh.

6. The aforesaid Demand Draft has been handed over by learned counsel appearing for the respondent to the appellant's counsel, who has handed over the same to the appellant, who is present in Court.

7. Accordingly, statement of both the parties is recorded that the dispute between the parties arising out of the judgment and decree dated 23 rd March, 2015 passed by ADJ-02, South West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Suit No. 885/2012, stands fully settled, in terms thereof. The impugned judgment and decree is modified accordingly.

8. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the appellant prays for refund of Court Fees.

9. Considering the fact that the parties have settled the dispute before this Court during the course of hearing, the Registry of this Court is directed to issue a certificate in favour of the appellant, for refund of Court Fees to the extent of 50%.

10. With the aforesaid directions, the present appeal is accordingly disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J DECEMBER 15, 2025/KR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter