Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish Gupta & Ors vs The State N.C.T. Of Delhi & Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 1813 Del

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1813 Del
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2025

Delhi High Court

Ashish Gupta & Ors vs The State N.C.T. Of Delhi & Anr on 11 August, 2025

                          $~62
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                          Date of decision: 11.08.2025
                          ,,,,,,,,,,




                          +            CRL.M.C. 5446/2025 & CRL.M.A. 23381/2025
                                       ASHISH GUPTA & ORS.                     .....Petitioners
                                                       Through: Mr. Ram Aktar Sharma, Mr.
                                                                 Priyank Basoya, Mr. Mohit
                                                                 Sharma, Ms. Astha Singh and
                                                                 Ms. Garima, Advocates.
                                                                     Petitioners in person.
                                                     versus
                                       THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI &ANR.        ... Respondents
                                                     Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State
                                                               with SI Sohan Lal, PS-Tigri.
                                                               Respondent No. 2 in person.

                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                                  JUDGMENT(ORAL)

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The Marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 solemnized on 10.02.2023 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Due to temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2

have started living separately since 09.10.2023. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. She further submits that petitioners coerced her to undergo abortion. Subsequently, FIR No. 202/2024 was lodged at instance of Respondent No. 2 under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 07.03.2025 at Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi. In view of the aforesaid settlement, Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 have dissolved their marriage by mutual consent on 02.06.2025. It is submitted that Petitioner No. 1 has paid the total settlement amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five lacs only), three gold rings and two anklets (silver) as per the schedule in settlement. Copy of the Settlement Deed dated 07.03.2025 has been annexed as Annexure P-3.

4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Sohan Lal, from PS Tigri.

5. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has no objection if the FIR No. 202/2024 is quashed against the Petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 202/2024 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J August 11, 2025 SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter