Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mamchand@Mc Mahesh vs Shri Vijay Kumar Khanna And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 5974 Del

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5974 Del
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024

Delhi High Court

Mamchand@Mc Mahesh vs Shri Vijay Kumar Khanna And Ors on 9 September, 2024

Author: Dharmesh Sharma

Bench: Dharmesh Sharma

                  *       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                  %                              Judgment reserved on : 29 August 2024
                                                 Judgment pronounced on: 09 September 2024

                  +       CONT.CAS(C) 1232/2024
                          MAMCHAND@ MC MAHESH                     .....Petitioner
                                     Through: Petitioner in person

                                                    versus

                          SHRI VIJAY KUMAR KHANNA AND ORS. .....Respondents
                                        Through: Mr. Gautam Suhag and Mr.
                                                 Ashish Verma, Advs. for R-3
                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
                                                    ORDER

CM APPL. 49483/2024 ( for recalling of order dated 09.08.2024)

1. The petitioner seeks recalling of the order dated 09.08.2024 passed by this Court in CONT.CAS(C) 1232/2024 and initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for knowingly interfering with the due course of justice in the pending suit No. 605/2024 before the learned Senior Civil Judge West-District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "learned Trial Court").

2. The aforesaid contempt case was disposed of vide order dated 09.08.2024 directing as under:

"5. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the property in question and the respondents have not only raised unauthorized construction, but are also contemplating/proposing alienating parts of the property which would lead to creation of third party rights. It is stated that the disposal of his application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC is getting delayed since

CONT CAS (C) 1232/2024

KUMAR VATS Signing Date:10.09.2024 15:48:30 the defendants/respondents are not coming forward despite service of notices.

6. It is also submitted that the matter is now coming up for hearing before Sh. Vaibhav Chaurasia, learned Civil Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, on 03.09.2024.

7. The present contempt petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned Civil Judge to ensure expeditious hearing and disposal of the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC moved by the petitioner/plaintiff before the Court in accordance with law."

3. No one is present for the respondents despite sending advance notice.

4. The petitioner, who has argued his own case, claims that he is a senior citizen, aged 72 years, and alleges continuous harassment by the respondents who are attempting to interfere and trespass into the petitioner‟s property located at B-238, Janta Colony (ShivaJi Vihar), Near Tagore Garden, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as „subject property‟). It is the case of the petitioner that he has served multiple legal notices upon the respondents on various dates viz., 02.03.2024, 28.03.2024, 14.06.2024 & 15.07.2024 but none of the aforesaid legal notices were responded to by the respondents. Therefore, he was constrained to file a suit for ejectment and permanent injunction on 20.04.2024 and despite the fact that summons have been issued by the learned Trial Court, it is stated that no one has cared to appear except for one respondent who has not even filed a reply.

5. It is submitted that although an application under Order VIII, Rule 10 CPC has been moved on 09.07.2024 since the conduct of the respondents demonstrates that they have deemed to have admitted the claims of the petitioner, the respondents are interfering with the

CONT CAS (C) 1232/2024

KUMAR VATS Signing Date:10.09.2024 15:48:30 judicial process and have allegedly attempted to sell and trespass into the subject property on 15.07.2024.

6. The petitioner has been impressed upon that the present contempt proceedings do not lie as there is no order or direction which has been passed by the learned Trial Court and subsequently flouted by the respondents. If the respondents are threatening to intervene and disturb the status quo or attempting to sell or trespass into the subject property, the petitioner has other efficacious remedies in law.

7. The present recall application is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court for seeking appropriate reliefs in accordance with law.

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

SEPTEMBER 09, 2024 Sadiq

CONT CAS (C) 1232/2024

KUMAR VATS Signing Date:10.09.2024 15:48:30

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter