Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Vimal Electrical Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Vat & Anr.
2024 Latest Caselaw 2129 Del

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2129 Del
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2024

Delhi High Court

M/S Vimal Electrical Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Vat & Anr. on 12 March, 2024

Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva

Bench: Sanjeev Sachdeva

                          $~14
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                       Date of decision: 12.03.2024
                          +      W.P.(C) 5384/2023

                          M/S VIMAL ELECTRICAL PVT LTD                                 .....Petitioner

                                                     versus


                          COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.                                ..... Respondent

                          Advocates who appeared in this case:

                          For the Petitioner:        Mr. Mohit Gautam, Advocate.
                          For the Respondent:        Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Samridhi
                                                     Vats, Advocates.
                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

                          JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks refund for the tax period 01.01.2017 to 31.03.2017. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the refund has been processed and sanctioned in favour of the petitioner though without interest.

2. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of directing the respondents to also pass an order considering the payment of interest in terms of section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. In case interest is payable, the same be also paid to the petitioner within a

period of four weeks. However, in case the department is of the view that interest is not payable, a speaking order be passed and communicated to the petitioner within the said period of four weeks.

3. It will be open to the petitioner to avail of further remedies as may be permissible in law, if aggrieved by the said order.

4. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J MARCH 12, 2024/ss

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter