Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amandeep Singh Dhall vs Central Bureau Of Investigation
2024 Latest Caselaw 772 Del

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 772 Del
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2024

Delhi High Court

Amandeep Singh Dhall vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 29 January, 2024

Author: Swarana Kanta Sharma

Bench: Swarana Kanta Sharma

                          $~

                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                      Date of Decision: 29.01.2024
                          +     BAIL APPLN. 2093/2023
                                MR. AMANDEEP SINGH DHAL                      ..... Petitioner
                                                   Through:     Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr.
                                                                Kartik Venu, Mr. Yash Datt,
                                                                Mr. Shashwat Sari and Ms.
                                                                Ariana Ahluwalia, Advocates
                                                   versus

                                DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT                ..... Respondent
                                                   Through:     Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special
                                                                Counsel for ED with Mr.
                                                                Vivek Gurnani and Ms.
                                                                Manisha Dubey, Advocates

                          +     BAIL APPLN. 2229/2023
                                AMANDEEP SINGH DHALL                            ..... Petitioner
                                                   Through:     Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr.
                                                                Kartik Venu, Mr. Yash Datt,
                                                                Mr. Shashwat Sari and Ms.
                                                                Ariana Ahluwalia, Advocates

                                                   versus

                                CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
                                                   Through:     Mr. Prakarsh Airan, Advocate

                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
                                                     JUDGMENT

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J. (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 2448/2024 in BAIL APPLN. 2093/2023 CRL.M.A. 2449/2024 in BAIL APPLN. 2229/2023

1. The instant applications under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C') and Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ('PMLA Act') have been filed by the applicant/petitioner, seeking specific directions for the applicant to be transferred to Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi for duration of twelve weeks for effective medical examination and consistent treatment in terms of liberty granted to the applicant vide order dated 22.12.2023.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that since the date of admission of the applicant in Safdarjung Hospital on 11.01.2024, the applicant was not given any medical treatment or care in terms of the prescribed specialised physiotherapy sessions, required to be given to him, till 14.01.2024, as was also directed by this Court. It is argued that it was only on 15.01.2024 that the applicant was given machine based physiotherapy (IFT/TENS/Ultrasonic) though still irregularly, however, he has till date not being given supervised manual physiotherapy session, as was prescribed to him. It is stated that the applicant is not being administered supervised cervical isometric exercises, as was prescribed to him by the Medical Officer In charge Tihar Jail, vide Medical Status report dated 16.12.2023. It is stated that the applicant was being administered supervised manual physiotherapy exercises every day for one hour in the morning and evening, while he was admitted at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre. It is argued that the concerned doctors are not following the standard

operating procedures for the physiotherapy sessions, as was prescribed by the doctors at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, where the applicant previously underwent C6-C7 transforaminal epidural steroid injection and right C6-C7 facet joint block under local anaesthesia. It is also stated that on 18.01.2024, the applicant was shown certain exercises to be done, but there has been no supervision, assistance by the concerned medical staff despite the applicant's request, and the applicant has not been able to do the exercises on his own owing to loss of sensation and aggravated debilitating pain.

3. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant the applicant has been suffering from cardiovascular problems and had been advised to undergo cardio-vascular examination as recorded in the medical status report filed by the Jail Superintendent on 28.12.2023, however, the applicant till date has not been effectively diagnosed/examined for the cardio-vascular related ailments. It is stated that the concerned medical officers at Safdarjung Hospital have informed the applicant that they have conducted an Echo test, but the applicant was neither informed about the test results, nor prescribed prognosis in terms of medicines. Further, the concerned doctors at Safdarjung Hospital have till date not conducted an Echo stress test, as was prescribed to him. It is further stated that the concerned doctors at Safdarjung Hospital have, till date, not conducted any procedure of transforaminal epidural steroid injection, which had to be administered to the Applicant for C3-C4 joint in the spine. Furthermore, the applicant has been evaluated and diagnosed

as a case of C3-C4 herniated Nucleus Pulposus (Annular Tear), and he was also informed by the concerned medical staff at Safdarjung Hospital that there is acute nerve compression in C5-C6 joint in the spine on the basis of the latest MRI scan conducted, which has not been supplied to the applicant herein. Despite this, the applicant has not been prescribed an effective course of treatment and is continuing to languish in aggravating pain.

4. It is the case of applicant herein, as advanced by the learned counsel appearing on his behalf that the inconsistent treatment being provided to him has further worsened the medical condition of the applicant, and has increased the loss of sensation in right hand and fingers. It is submitted that numbness and tingling, or loss of sensation is commonly caused on account of damaged or compressed nerves. It is also submitted that prolonged symptoms of numbness and tingling might be due to various underlying neurological or physiological conditions such as - Carpal tunnel syndrome, Diabetes, Migraines, Multiple Sclerosis, Seizures, Stroke, Underactive thyroid or other ailments.

5. In these circumstances, it is prayed on behalf of the applicant that he be transferred to Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi for a duration of twelve weeks for effective and consistent medical treatment required by him.

6. Learned Special counsel appearing on behalf of the Directorate of Enforcement vehemently opposes the application for modification which has been preferred on behalf of the applicant. It is argued that the treatment required by the applicant in terms of post epidural care

including physiotherapy is being provided to him at the Safdarjung Hospital. It is also submitted that specialized doctors of the cardio- vascular department of the Safdarjung Hospital are also looking after the needs of the applicant and are carrying out the required medical tests. It is, therefore, prayed that the present application be dismissed.

7. This Court has heard arguments addressed by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Special Counsel for the respondent, and has perused the material on record.

8. In the present case, the learned predecessor Bench had earlier permitted the applicant to be admitted for specialized treatment in ILBS Hospital, Delhi vide order dated 19.09.2023 after considering the medical history of the applicant, the advice of the doctor concerned and requirement for his further treatment. Thereafter, this Court had allowed the request of applicant to be admitted for further treatment at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi for a period of three weeks vide order dated 16.10.2023. However, after considering the improvement in the medical condition of the applicant, this Court had dismissed the application for extending the stay of the applicant at the concerned hospital vide order dated 17.11.2023.

9. Vide order dated 22.12.2023, this Court had directed the prison authorities to shift the applicant to Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi for required physiotherapy sessions in terms of post-epidural treatment. However, it was also clarified that if required medical care is not provided to the applicant at Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, he shall be at

liberty to move a fresh application before this Court for being treated at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi.

10. Thereafter, vide order dated 08.01.2024, this Court had declined the request of applicant to get shifted to Indian Spinal Injuries Centre since he had himself denied to get admitted in Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi for getting the required treatment, without any plausible justification. However, this Court had ordered that applicant may be admitted in a Private ward/room in Zone-I of Super speciality Block of the Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi.

11. The applicant herein has now complied with the aforesaid order of this Court, and was admitted for medical treatment in Safdarjung Hospital on 11.01.2024.

12. However, while pressing this application, learned counsel for applicant, in a nutshell, has argued that though the applicant was admitted in Safdarjung Hospital on 11.01.2024, till date, there has been lack of supervised manual physiotherapy sessions which have been prescribed to him; the Echo stress test has not been conducted till date and he has not been effectively examined by a cardio- vascular disease expert; and procedure of transforaminal epidural steroid injection, which had to be administered to the Applicant for C3-C4 joint in the spine, has not been carried out.

13. In such facts and circumstances, this Court notes that the learned predecessor Bench vide order dated 19.09.2023 had directed that the applicant be admitted in ILBS Hospital Delhi and thereafter, spinal treatment relating to C3-C4 Herniated Nucleus Pulposus and Right C6-C7 foraminal disc osteophyte, being specialized treatment,

was ordered to be conducted in Indian Spinal Injuries Centre vide order dated 16.10.2023, and he was treated with neuropathic medication, physiotherapy (IFT, TENS and Ultrasound therapy) alongwith supportive and symptomatic medication as well as C6-C7 transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

14. Though the jail dispensary and the doctors at Safdarjung hospital have extended the best possible treatment to the applicant herein, but as it appears prima facie from the records, the applicant has yet not been provided with the adequate treatment and relief required by him at this stage. Moreover, he has stated that the numbness and loss of sensation in his right hand and fingers has increased and that the specialized post epidural care, as well as effective cardio-vascular examination and treatment could not be extended to him.

15. In the circumstances as the present one, and considering that any degeneration or complication in the spine of the applicant due to non-providing of the specialized treatment can have devastating effect on his overall health in his future life, and considering that he was given specialized treatment for spine related issues at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, this Court directs that the applicant be shifted to Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi, for a duration of three (03) weeks, on the same terms and conditions as imposed vide para 28 in order dated 22.12.2023, and the applicant shall continue to remain in custody of the Jail Superintendent.

16. The report will be provided after three weeks, three days prior to the expiry of the period of such admission in the hospital, to this

Court by Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, Delhi, regarding the medical condition of the applicant and future course of treatment.

17. In above terms, the present applications are disposed of.

18. Copy of this order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent forthwith for information and necessary action.

19. Order be given dasti under the signatures of court master.

20. The judgment be uploaded on the website forthwith.

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2024/At

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter