Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Civilian Welfare Charitable ... vs Union Of India & Ors.
2021 Latest Caselaw 3256 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3256 Del
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Delhi High Court
Civilian Welfare Charitable ... vs Union Of India & Ors. on 30 November, 2021
                          $~129

                          *       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                     Date of Decision : 30th November, 2021
                          +       W.P.(C) 13543/2021
                                  CIVILIAN WELFARE CHARITABLE TRUST REGD THROUGH
                                  ITS CHAIRMAN MOHD KAMRAN               ..... Petitioner
                                               Through: Mr. Sujit Kishore Bhattacharya,
                                               Ms.Seema Sharma & Mr.Daood Ahmed,
                                               Advocates.
                                                     versus
                                  UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                        ..... Respondents
                                                Through: Mr. Syed Husain Adil Taqvi,
                                                Government Pleader with Mr Farman Ali and
                                                Mr.Athar Raza Farooquei, Advocates for R-1.
                                                Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq, Standing Counsel with
                                                Ms.Ramsha Shan, Ms. Sabika Ahmed, Advocates
                                                with Ms. Shaista Siddiqui, Law Officer (DWB) for
                                                R-4.
                                                Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel (NDMC) with
                                                Mr. Hardik Aggarwal, Advocate for R-8.
                                                Mr. Ashim Vachher & Mr. Kunal Lakra,
                                                Advocates for R-9.
                                                Mr. Hashmat Nabi & Mr. Farah Naaz, Advocates
                                                for R-10.

                                  CORAM:
                                  HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                  HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
                                                           JUDGMENT

: D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL.42742/2021 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

Signature Not Verified AMIT NARAYAN BHARTHUAR Location:

Signing Date:04.12.2021 12:06:52 W.P.(C) 13543/2021 & CM APPL.42743/2021 (Stay)

1. Present writ petition, styled as Public Interest Litigation, has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

"A. Issue Direction to respondents to construct and develop a senior secondary girls school with all the modern day amenities on plot bearing no.2438-2443 Kamra Bangash, Main Road, Tiraha Behram Khan, Darya Ganj Opposite Khajoor Wali Masjid Delhi 110006.

B. Issue Directions to respondent no. 1 introduce norms and standard of inclusive education of girl child within the ambit of the RTE ACT.

C. Issue Directions to the respondents to take appropriate action for removing illegal occupants/encroachers from plot bearing no. 2438-2443 Kamra Bangash, Main Road, Tiraha Behram Khan, Darya Ganj Opposite Khajoor Wali Masjid Delhi 110006.

D. Issue directions to the respondents to take appropriate action for removing tenants with immediate effect from plot bearing no.2438-2443 Kamra Bangash, Main Road, Tiraha Behram Khan, Darya Ganj Opposite Khajoor Wali Masjid Delhi 110006.

E. Issue directions to the respondents to protect the land from tenants/transfer of tenancy/encroachment/sale and purchase with immediate effect from plot bearing no.2438-2443 Kamra Bangash, Main Road, Tiraha Behram Khan, Darya Ganj Opposite Khajoor Wali Masjid Delhi 110006. F. Pass such further order as may be deemed fit and proper fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

2. We have heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as well as Respondents No.4 and 8.

3. From the pleadings in the writ petition itself it is evident that both Respondent No.4 as well as Respondent No.8 are claiming ownership rights

Signature Not Verified AMIT NARAYAN BHARTHUAR Location:

Signing Date:04.12.2021 12:06:52 in the property in question, which is situated at Plot No.2438-2443, Kamra Bangash, Main Road, Tiraha Behram Khan, Darya Ganj, Opposite Khajoor Wali Masjid, Delhi-110006. Even the documents appended to the writ petition evidence an ownership dispute between the aforesaid Respondents. Annexure P-6 is a response to an RTI application dated 30.01.2020, furnished by North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 18.02.2020, according to which NDMC claims to be the owner of the property as per the record of the Department of Land and Estate.

4. Compared and contrasted to Annexure P-6, is an affidavit filed by Wakf Board in writ petition being W.P.(C) 13235/2018 (Annexure P/3 to the Memo of this petition), wherein claim to ownership of the subject property was asserted by the Wakf Board, which was Respondent No.3 in the writ petition. Petitioner has also placed on record a copy of the judgment dated 13.09.2019 passed by this Court in the aforementioned writ petition, (Annexure P/4), wherein, a statement was made on behalf of GNCTD/Respondent No.2 therein that the plot in question belonged to the Wakf Board/Respondent No.3 therein.

5. A plain reading of the writ petition and the annexures appended thereto makes it obvious that the petitioner is clearly conscious of the fact that there is a dispute with regard to ownership of the subject property and has yet chosen to file the present petition. It is a settled law that disputed questions of fact, more particularly, ownership disputes cannot be adjudicated in a writ jurisdiction as the same would require evidence, both oral and documentary. Till the dispute of ownership of the subject property is not resolved, this Court cannot give a direction to the Respondents to construct and develop a Senior Secondary Girls School, with all modern day

Signature Not Verified AMIT NARAYAN BHARTHUAR Location:

Signing Date:04.12.2021 12:06:52 amenities over the plot in question, as sought for by the Petitioner, in the present writ petition.

6. In view of the aforesaid, we do not see any reason to entertain this writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000/- to be paid by the Petitioner to the Delhi State Legal Services Authority, within a period of six weeks from today. The aforesaid amount shall be utilized for the programme 'Access to Justice'.

7. Pending application is also disposed of.

8. A copy of this order be sent to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi- 110001.

CHIEF JUSTICE

JYOTI SINGH, J

NOVEMBER 30, 2021 ns

Signature Not Verified AMIT NARAYAN BHARTHUAR Location:

Signing Date:04.12.2021 12:06:52

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter