Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1418 Del
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2021
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 11.05.2021
+ Crl.M.C. 1170/2021
AKASH SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Bhatia, Advocate
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, Additional
Public Prosecutor for respondent
No.1/ State with SI Ashok Rajbani
Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (oral)
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Vide present petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.
222/2013, which was initially registered for the offences under Sections
380/448/420/34 IPC at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi but charge sheet in
the said FIR has been filed for the offences under Sections
380/448/468/471/120B/34 IPC.
2. Quashing of the FIR in question has been sought on the ground that
the dispute pertaining to property No. 4/2675-A, Gali No.6, Bihari Colony,
Shahdara, between petitioners and respondent No.2, which led to
registration of FIR in question and also various other litigations, has been
amicably resolved between the parties.
3. Notice issued.
4. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for
respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is
present through video conferencing and he has been identified as the
complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who
is also present through video conferencing.
5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the dispute inter se
parties is essentially civil in nature however, has led to initiation of multiple
legal proceedings. He further states that parties have amicably resolved their
dispute in terms of Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 23.03.2021 and have
agreed to withdraw all the cases pending against each other.
6. Respondent No.2, who is the complainant of this FIR and is present
through video conferencing, has confirmed the factum of settlement reached
with petitioners in terms of afore-noted Compromise/Settlement Deed dated
23.03.2021, He has also affirmed the contents of his affidavit dated
01.04.2021 filed in support of this petition.
7. Keeping in view that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably
resolved between the parties, this Court finds that no useful purpose would
be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of FIR in question.
8. Accordingly, FIR No. 222/2013, registered at police station Farsh
Bazar, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
9. The above captioned petition is accordingly disposed of.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J MAY 11, 2021 r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!