Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akshay Suri vs Central Reserve Police Force And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3515 Del

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3515 Del
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Delhi High Court
Akshay Suri vs Central Reserve Police Force And ... on 17 December, 2021
                          $~76
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                                     Date of Decision: 17.12.2021

                          +      W.P. (C) 13137/2021 & CM 41427/2021
                                 AKSHAY SURI                                 ..... Petitioner
                                                  Through   Mr.Amit Kaushik and
                                                            Ms.Bhateri Devi, Advs.

                                                     versus

                                 CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE & ORS.
                                                                   ..... Respondents
                                              Through  Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with
                                                       Mr.Kamal R.Digpaul, Adv. for
                                                       UOI with Dr. Amarnath Kumar,
                                                       CRPF, DC/SMO & Dr.
                                                       Naishadh J.Jivrajani, BSF, DC.

                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

                                 NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner had applied for the 'Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination, 2019'.

2. The petitioner was declared medically unfit for appointment in the Detailed Medical Examination on the following grounds:-

1. DOV BE - 6/12 Rt, 6/9 Lt

2. Tremor

3. Helix Vulgus (Rt)

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34

3. The respondents thereafter referred the petitioner for medical examination to the Jawahar Lal Nehru Hospital, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as 'JLN Hospital'). It is the case of the petitioner that during such examination the petitioner was found to be medically fit, however, inspite of the same in the Review Medical Examination the petitioner was declared unfit due to Helix Vulgus (Rt).

4. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.12.2021, the respondents have produced before us the original medical record of the petitioner. The doctors of the Review Medical Examination Board are also present in Court today.

5. The medical documents produced by the respondents shows that the JLN Hospital, vide a report dated 23.10.2021, had found the petitioner to be orthopedically fit. The doctors who are present in Court explain that the petitioner was not referred to the JLN Hospital for an orthopedic opinion, but only for an X-Ray. They submit that there is an over-writing on the referral letter so as to include an orthopedic opinion. The doctors submit that in any case, the said opinion is not binding on the respondents as the civilian doctor would not be in a position to ascertain the standards required for appointment in the respondent service.

6. Be that as it may, as we have an opinion from the JLN Hospital which declares the petitioner to be orthopedically fit, in the peculiar facts of the present case, we are of the opinion that petitioner should

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34 be examined by the Army R&R Hospital, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'R&R Hospital') for his alleged Helix Vulgus (Rt). For this purpose, the respondent shall request the R&R Hospital to constitute a Board of doctors consisting of a specialist Orthopedic and give an appointment to the petitioner for being examined within a period of ten days from today. The report of the R&R Hospital shall be considered as final, with no party being allowed to challenge the same. The respondent shall act upon the appointment application of the petitioner in accordance with the report that is received from the R&R Hospital within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the report. The report received from the R&R Hospital shall also be shared with the petitioner.

7. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.

8. The original medical record of the petitioner is returned back to the respondents.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

MANMOHAN, J

DECEMBER 17, 2021/rv

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Signing Date:18.12.2021 14:35:34

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter