Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 406 Del
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2020
$~64
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 21.01.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 288/2020
DINESH GROVER & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State.
SI Shubhangi PS Preet Vihar.
Respondent no.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 1234/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.288/2020
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.387/2016 dated 02.11.2016 registered at Police Station Preet Vihar and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2
and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is
taken up for final disposal.
6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.04.2011 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.
7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement before Delhi
Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated
29.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹3,25,000/-(Rupees Three Lacs
Twenty Five Thousand only). It is submitted that the respondent No. 2 has
already received an amount of ₹3 lakhs (Rupees Three Lacs only). A
demand draft bearing No.364689 dated 29.11.2019 for the balance amount
of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) is handed over to the
respondent No. 2 today in the Court.
9. The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and has been
identified by SI Shubhangi of Police Station Preet Vihar and submits that
matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any
further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners
any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.387/2016 dated
02.11.2016 registered at Police Station Preet Vihar and consequent
proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
13. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE JANUARY 21, 2020 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!