Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 221 Del
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2020
$~68
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 14.01.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 126/2020
ROHIT KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr.Suresh Chand Joshi, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State.
Mr.Harish Nigam, Adv. for R-2.
Insp.Ghanshyam Kishore ASI
Dineshan PS Mayapuri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 549/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.126/2020
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.89/2016 dated 13.02.2016 registered at Police Station Mayapuri and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 06.11.2011 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.
7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Family
Court, Delhi vide settlement agreement dated 07.05.2019 and settled all their
disputes amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹8,00,000/-(Rupees Eight Lacs only).
It is submitted that the respondent No. 2 has already received an amount of
₹6 lakhs (Rupees Six Lacs only). A demand draft bearing No.186977 dated
09.01.2020 for the balance amount of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs only)
is handed over to the respondent No. 2 today in the Court.
9. The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person with her
counsel and has been identified by ASI Dineshan and submits that matter
has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.89/2016 dated 13.02.2016
registered at Police Station Mayapuri and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
13. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE JANUARY 14, 2020 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!