Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S H.S. Arora And Company vs The Commissioner Trade And Taxes, ...
2020 Latest Caselaw 188 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 188 Del
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2020

Delhi High Court
M/S H.S. Arora And Company vs The Commissioner Trade And Taxes, ... on 13 January, 2020
$~21
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      W.P.(C) 224/2020
       M/S H.S. ARORA AND COMPANY              ..... Petitioner
                       Through: Mr. Anif Ahmed Khan & Mr.Manoj
                       Kumar Sharma, Advocates
                  Versus
    THE COMMISSIONER TRADE
    AND TAXES, AND ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                     Through: Mr.Ajay Aggarwal & Mr.Ankit
                     Monga, Advocates along with Ms.Rajni Vashist,
                     LA
    CORAM:
    HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
                     ORDER

% 13.01.2020 CM No. 714/2020 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C)224/2020.

1. This petition has been preferred for getting the refund of Rs.1,72,20,572/- for the periods running from January, 2010 to March, 2011, for the months of July, 2011, January, 2012, March 2012 and March, 2014 with interest @ 6% under Section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for the disposal of this petition, a direction is given to the respondent no.3/ Value Added Tax Officer to decide the claim and refund of the petitioner within the stipulated time in accordance with law.

3. Having heard counsel for both parties and in the facts and circumstances of this case, we hereby direct the respondent no.3/ Value Added Tax Officer , Ward 80, I.P. Estate, New Delhi to decide the claim and refund of the petitioner in accordance with rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case and also keeping in mind principle of unjust enrichment propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment titled Mafatlal Industries vs. Union of India, (1997) 5 SCC 536 as early as possible practicably preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order of this Court.

4. With these observations this writ petition is hereby disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

C.HARI SHANKAR, J JANUARY 13, 2020 hk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter