Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raghubir Kaur (Since Deceased ) ... vs Suresh Kumar
2020 Latest Caselaw 3376 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 3376 Del
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2020

Delhi High Court
Raghubir Kaur (Since Deceased ) ... vs Suresh Kumar on 10 December, 2020
                                      $~7
                                      * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                      %                                  Judgment delivered on: 10.12.2020

                                      +      CM(M) 527/2020

                                             RAGHUBIR KAUR (SINCE DECEASED ) THROUGH LRS
                                                                                ..... Petitioner
                                                         versus
                                             SURESH KUMAR                                       ..... Respondent
                                      Advocates who appeared in this case:
                                      For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate.
                                      For the Respondent: Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi, Advocate.
                                      CORAM:-
                                      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

                                                                     JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

CM (M) 527/2020 & CM APPL.27196/2020 (under Order 22 Rule

3)

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns order dated 07.10.2020, whereby, application of the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a revision petition has been partly allowed inasmuch as the appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn, without granting any express liberty to file a revision petition.

3. Petitioner had filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, which petition was dismissed by order dated 05.06.2018.

Digitally Signed By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:10.12.2020 22:13:42 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

4. Impugning the order dismissing the eviction petition, petitioner filed the subject appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

5. During arguments in the appeal, written arguments were filed by the respondent contending that an appeal was not maintainable and the remedy of the petitioner was only by way of a revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

6. Faced with the objection taken in the written arguments, petitioner filed the subject application seeking permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a revision petition.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact no express liberty has been granted to the petitioner, petitioner would be precluded from filing a revision petition.

8. This is disputed by learned counsel for the respondent, who submits that the remedy of the petitioner was to file a revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act because Section 25 B is a separate Code in itself and it expressly provides for a remedy of the revision against the order allowing or dismissing an eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

9. In my view the petitioner has filed the present petition merely on an apprehension that his revision petition is not likely to be entertained, if filed.

Digitally Signed By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:10.12.2020 22:13:42 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

10. It is a settled position that against an order dismissing an eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, remedy is only by way of a revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. Petitioner appears to have been incorrectly advised to file an appeal and since the appeal itself was not maintainable, nothing prevents the petitioner from filing a revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. Petitioner does not need express permission or leave to file a revision under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

11. In my view, no express leave or liberty is required by the petitioner to file a revision petition after withdrawing his appeal which was filed before a wrong forum especially in view of the objections specifically having been taken by the respondent that the appeal was not maintainable and only a revision under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act would lie required.

12. The impugned order does not require any interference. Petition is dismissed with the above observation.

13. Copy of the judgment be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

                                      DECEMBER 10, 2020                      SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
                                      st


Digitally Signed By:KUNAL
MAGGU
Signing Date:10.12.2020 22:13:42
This file is digitally signed by PS
to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter