Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarla & Ors. vs Sh. B K Moti & Ors (Tata Aig Gen ...
2019 Latest Caselaw 4082 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4082 Del
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2019

Delhi High Court
Sarla & Ors. vs Sh. B K Moti & Ors (Tata Aig Gen ... on 3 September, 2019
$~13
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                                 Decided on: 03.09.2019

+      MAC.APP. 149/2018
       SARLA & ORS                                 ..... Appellants
                         Through: Mr.Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocate

                         versus

       SH B K MOTI & ORS(TATA AIG GEN INSURANCE CO.LTD)
                                             ..... Respondents
                         Through: Mr.Rudra Kahlon and Ms.Vandana
                         Kahlon, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

NAJMI WAZIRI, J. (Oral)

1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 28.10.2017 on the ground that although seven claimants were arrayed in the Claim Petition i.e. the widow and four children and the parents of the deceased, only six were considered as dependents therefore, in terms of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680 the deduction ought to have been 1/5th of the earnings of the deceased instead of 1/4th. However, learned counsel for the respondents refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Sarla Verma vs. Delhi Transport Corporation (2009) 6 SCC 121 which has been referred in Pranay Sethi (Supra) and still holds the field, that unless there is evidence to the contrary the father will be presumed to be not

dependent upon his son. The mother of the deceased had passed away during the pendency of the claim petition.

2. The Court is of the view that in circumstances, deduction of only 1/4th was rightly made from the earnings. The enhancement however, is sought on account of non-grant of compensation on the basis of the income of the deceased i.e. Rs. 18,000/- per month, after adding 50% thereon towards: (i) loss of future prospect, (ii) inflation in the cost of living, (iii)after applying the multiplier of 16 and deducting only 1/5th towards personal expenses. The impugned award has granted the following compensation:

           Sl Name of Heads                               Compensation
           No.

           1.    Loss of dependency/ contribution         Rs.10,77,984/-
                 to the family [7486x12x16x75/100]
           2.    Loss of consortium                       Rs. 1,00,000/-
           3.    Loss of love and affection               Rs. 1,50,000/-
           4.    Loss of estate                           Rs. 50,000/-
           5.    Funeral expenses                         Rs. 50,000/-
                              Total                       Rs. 14,27,984/-


3. It is contended that the compensation is to be granted for "loss of consortium" and "loss of love and affection" to each of the claimants. In terms of dicta of the Supreme Court in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1546,

compensation towards "loss of consortium", be it spousal consortium or parental consortium or filial consortium, etc. would be payable to each of the claimants @ Rs.40,000/-. The same judgment also granted compensation for "loss of love and affection" @ Rs.50,000/- to each of the claimant. The Court agrees that the same emoluments ought to be and are hereby awarded to each of the claimants. For "loss of estate" and "funeral expenses", the impugned order has awarded Rs.50,000/-, the same shall be reduced to Rs.15,000/- for each head in terms of Pranay Sethi (Supra).

4. The Court would further note that the deceased was 35 years of age at the time of the accident and his loss of earning was computed on the basis of minimum wage payable to an unskilled worker i.e. Rs. 89,832 annually. An addition of 40% ought to have been made on the same towards compensation for "loss of future prospects" in terms of Pranay Sethi (supra). It is so granted.

5. Accordingly, the total payable amount would be as under:

        S.No. Particulars                    Amount

           1.   Loss of Dependency Rs. 15,09,178/-
                Rs. 7,486/- (minimum
                wage) x 12 (months) x 16
                (multiplier) x 75/100 (1/4
                deduction          towards
                personal expenses) x
                140/100 (loss of future
                prospects)
           2.   Loss of love and Rs. 3,00,000 /-
                affection
                Rs. 50,000/- x 6



              (claimants)
          3. Loss of consortium       Rs. 2,40,000/-
             Rs. 40,000/- x 6
             (claimants)
          4. Loss of Estate           Rs. 15,000/-
          5. Funeral Expenses         Rs. 15,000/-
        TOTAL                         Rs. 20,79,178/-

6. Therefore, the total amount payable to the claimants shall be Rs. 20,79,178/-. Let the enhanced amount of Rs. 6,51,194/- alongwith interest @ 9% from the date of the filing of the petition till its realisation be deposited before the learned Tribunal within three weeks from date of receipt of copy of this order to be released to the beneficiaries of the award in terms of the scheme of disbursement specified in the award.

7. The appeal stands disposed off, in the above terms.

8. Let a copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 ssn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter