Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5306 Del
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2019
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 31.10.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 4559/2019
RAKESH KUMAR KWATRA & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. N.K. Mishra and Ms. Alka, Advs.
versus
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State.
Mr. Manish Bansal and Ms. Aarti
Tyagi, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in
person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
26/2013 dated 23.01.2013 registered at Police Station - South Rohini and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.06.2010 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from
17.04.2011.
5. The petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2 have entered into an
amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 29.01.2019 and settled all
their disputes amicably.
6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and for her
identification purposes, original of her Aadhaar (bearing No. 7698 4596
0007 ) has been seen and returned. It is submits that matter has been settled
and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
7. The total settlement amount is ₹7,00,000/-(Rupees (Seven Lakhs). It
is submitted that the respondent No. 2 has already received an amount of ₹5
lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs). A demand draft bearing No.870701 dated
30.08.2019 for the balance amount of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs) is
handed over to the respondent No. 2 today in the Court.
8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 26/2013 dated 23.01.2013
registered at Police Station - South Rohini and consequent proceedings
arising therefrom are quashed.
10. The petition is allowed accordingly.
11. Dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE
OCTOBER 31, 2019 PB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!