Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5043 Del
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: October 18, 2019
+ W.P.(CRL) 2324/2019
JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Himanshu Thakur &
Ms. Manokamna, Advocates
Versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. R.S.Kundu, Additional
Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)
1. In this petition, the first relief sought by petitioners is for protection from second respondent and the second relief is to transfer the investigation to some other investigating agency.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he does not press the second prayer. He states that he presses his application seeking protection.
3. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for State submits that DCP concerned will assess the threat perception in this case.
4. Let mobile number of Beat Constable, Division Officer as well as SHO be provided to the petitioners so that in case of any exigency, they can contact the concerned officials and in the meanwhile, the SHO concerned will ensure safety of petitioners round the clock.
5. In view of above directions, learned counsel for petitioners does not press this petition.
6. This petition is disposed of accordingly.
(BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE OCROBER 18, 2019 r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!