Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4793 Del
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2019
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 09.10.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 5070/2019
ZUBER KHAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Israr Ahmad, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State
ASI Shyam Sunder, PS Palam Village
Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Adv. for
R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. . 37582/2019
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 5070/2019
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
0344/2016 dated 20.09.2016 registered at Police Station Palam Village and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and further with the consent of the counsel for the parties,
the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.11.2011.
Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no.1 and respondent
no.2, they started living separately.
7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their
well wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement vide
order dated 11.04.2019 before Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi and
settled all their disputes amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹3,75,000/-(Rupees Three Lacs
Seventy Five Thousand only). It is submitted that the respondent no.2 has
already received an amount of ₹ 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs). Balance
amount of ₹1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lac Seventy Five Thousand Only) is
handed over to the respondent no.2 in cash today in the Court.
9. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been
identified by SI Dharmender Sharma of Police Station Palam Village and
submits that since the matter has been settled, therefore, she does not wish to
prosecute the petitioners any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 0344/2016 dated
20.09.2016 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
13. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCOTBER 09, 2019 ms
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!