Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) & Ors.
2019 Latest Caselaw 1291 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1291 Del
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2019

Delhi High Court
Suresh vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 27 February, 2019
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                       Date of Order: February 27, 2019

+      CRL.M.C. 1149/2019
       SURESH                                          ..... Petitioner
                         Through:     Mr. Anil Garg, Advocate

                         Versus

       STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents
                     Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public
                              Prosecutor for respondent No.1-
                              State with ASI Rajesh Kumar
                              Respondents No.2 & 3 in person

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                         ORDER

(ORAL)

Quashing of FIR No. 288/2005, under Section 363 IPC, registered at police station Ashok Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavits of respondents No. 2 & 3.

Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondents No.2 & 3, are present in the Court and they have been identified to be so, by ASI Rajesh Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by them.

Respondent No.2, present in the Court, supports the stand taken by her in statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and respondent No.3 submits that the misunderstanding, which led to registration of FIR in question,

now stands cleared. Respondents No.2 & 3 submit that respondent No.2 had married petitioner in June, 2005 i.e. soon after this incident and out of this marriage, three children were born and that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are happily living together and so, to maintain cordiality amongst the parties, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.

Upon hearing and on perusal of statement of second respondent recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., I find that continuance of proceedings arising out of FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.

Accordingly, FIR No. 288/2005, under Section 363 IPC, registered at police station Ashok Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

This petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE FEBRUARY 27, 2019 r

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter