Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6655 Del
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2019
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 18.12.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 5762/2019 and CRL.M.A. 40136/2019
HARMINDER SINGH KHATRI & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Prag Chawla and Mr. C.R. Lal,
Advs.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with
SI Dharamvir Singh, PS - CWC
Nanak Pura, New Delhi
Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit
Barawal, Advs. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.66/2009 dated 13.05.2009 registered at Police Station - CWC Cell,
Nanak Pura, New Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.04.2001, as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from
21.09.2006.
5. The petitioner No. 1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their
well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide
settlement deed dated 21.12.2009 and settled all their disputes amicably.
6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been
identified by SI - Dharamvir Singh of Police Station - CWC Nanak Pura and
submits that matter has been settled and the petitioner has agreed to pay an
amount of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs) and that the
respondent No. 2 does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 66/2009 dated 13.05.2009
registered at Police Station - CWC Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
9. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had deposited an amount of
Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs) at the time of granting bail by
this Court. Since the FIR and emanating proceedings thereto are hereby
quashed against the petitioner, therefore, the Registry of this Court is
directed to release an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five
Lakhs) with interest accrued thereon, if any, in favour of the respondent No.
2/ complainant on taking steps by her.
10. The petition is allowed accordingly. Pending application also stands
disposed of.
11. Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER 18, 2019 PB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!