Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6332 Del
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2019
$~67
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 06.12.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 6288/2019
AJAY KAUSHIK & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Rahul Nagpal, Adv. with
petitioners in person
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State
SI. Ashok, PS Farsh Bazar
Mr. Jitender Singh, Adv. for R-2 with
R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 42058/2019
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.6288/2019
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
884/2014 dated 13.11.2014 registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.06.2006 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Out of the said wedlock, one child namely Nidhi
Kaushik was born. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners
and respondent no.2, they started living separately.
7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settled all their disputes
amicably before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi, whereby the petitioners have agreed to pay against a sum of
₹15 lacs to respondent No. 2 towards all her claims. Out of the total
settlement amount of ₹ 15 lacs, ₹ 10 lacs have already been received by the
respondent no.2 and the balance ₹5 lacs have been handed over to her by the
petitioner no.1 in the Court today by way of a demand draft bearing
no.154422 dated 04.12.2019 drawn on Punjab & Sind Bank.
8. The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person with her
counsel and has been identified by SI Ashok of Police Station Farsh Bazar
and submits that the matter has been settled and she does not wish to
prosecute the matter any further.
9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 884/2014 dated
13.11.2014 registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar and consequent
proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
11. The petition is allowed accordingly.
12. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER 06, 2019 sm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!