Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surya Pratap Singh & Anr. vs State Of Karnataka & Anr.
2019 Latest Caselaw 3687 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 3687 Del
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2019

Delhi High Court
Surya Pratap Singh & Anr. vs State Of Karnataka & Anr. on 7 August, 2019
$~32

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                            Judgment delivered on: 07.08.2019
+       BAIL APPLN. 1937/2019
        SURYA PRATAP SINGH & ANR.                               ..... Petitioners
                       versus

        STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR                                ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner :            Mr. Saleem Ahmed with Ms. Charu
                                Dalal, Mr. Mayank Dawar, Mr. Ajay
                                Pratap Singh and Mr. Amit,
                                Advocates.
For the Respondent:             Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State.
                                SI Rakesh Sharma, PS Kalkaji.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

                                   JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek transit bail in FIR No.55/2019 under Sections 420/34 IPC, Uttara Kannada District, Police Station Karwar Town, Karnataka.

2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with several other individuals had approached M/s. Overseas Advisors Pvt. Ltd., of whom the petitioners are the Directors, for availing their visa services.

3. It is contended that Rs.80,000/- per head was paid by the complainants and a total sum of Rs.4,34,000/- had been paid to them which was transferred through banking channels but visa was not granted and accordingly, the complaint has been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated. He submits that the services for making an application for visa was to be provided by them and there was never any assurance given that visa would be granted by the respective countries.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the bank accounts of the Company as well as the personal account of the petitioner No.2 have already been attached. He submits that transit bail is sought so that the petitioners can approach the concerned Court at Karnataka for seeking appropriate protection

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are further willing to deposit a sum of Rs.1 lakh.

7. Without commenting on the merits of the case and in view of the averments in the application, petitioners are granted transit bail for a period of 2 weeks to approach the concerned Court for seeking appropriate protection.

8. It is clarified that this protection shall cease on the expiry of the period of 2 weeks from today or on filing of an application before the

concerned Court whichever is earlier.

9. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

10. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 07, 2019 st

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter