Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 3582 Del
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: July 25, 2019
Pronounced on: 01 August, 2019
+ CRL.M.C. 2529/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10550/2017
V BALASUBRAMANIAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy,
Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu,
Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved
Prakash Sharma, Advocates
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special
Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa
Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates
+ CRL.M.C. 2530/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10552/2017
A. N. SETHURAMAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy,
Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu,
Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved
Prakash Sharma, Advocates
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special
Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa
Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates
+ CRL.M.C. 2531/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10554/2017
SHANKAR ADAWAL ..... Petitioner
CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 3
Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior
Advocate, with Mr. Siddharth
Singh Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha,
Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Sharang
Dhulia & Mr. Govind Venugopal,
Advocate
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special
Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa
Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates
+ CRL.M.C. 2532/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10556/2017
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy,
Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu,
Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved
Prakash Sharma, Advocates
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special
Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa
Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
The challenge in the above captioned petitions is to impugned order of 15th May, 2017 vide which application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. of respondent-CBI has been allowed by the trial court.
Since vide separate order in Crl.M.C. 2594/2012 proceeding arising out of RC No. 9(s)/1998, titled as CBI Vs. (i) V. Balasubramanian
(ii) A.N. Sethuraman (iii) Shanker Adawal & (iv) Reliance Industries Ltd. through V. Balasubramanian, have been quashed, therefore these petitions and applications are disposed of as infructuous.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE JULY 25, 2019 p'ma/r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!