Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 2404 Del
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: April 17, 2018
+ W.P.(C) 3749/2018 & C.M. No. 14848/2018
SMT. GEETA KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. J.K. Singh & Mr. Omprakash
Kumar Srivastava, Advocates
Versus
MANAGEMENT, SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE
COLLEGE AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal,
Mr. Prang Newmai & Ms. Slomita Rai,
Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
(ORAL)
1. For the relief sought in this petition, petitioner had made various Representations, which were not responded to. Ultimately, petitioner had sent a Legal / Demand Notice of 6th October, 2015 (Annexure P-31) seeking payment of gratuity and pension.
2. According to petitioner's counsel, there is no response to Representation of 2nd February, 2015 (Annexure P-30) and aforesaid Legal / Demand Notice of 6th October, 2015 (Annexure P-31).
3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to direct respondent-College to effectively respond to Legal / Demand Notice of 6th October, 2015 (Annexure P-31) in the light of petitioner's
Representation of 2nd February, 2015 (Annexure P-30) within four weeks by passing a speaking order and its fate be communicated to petitioner within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be.
4. With aforesaid directions, this petition and application are disposed of.
A copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for petitioner.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
APRIL 17, 2018 r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!