Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Securitrans India Pvt Ltd vs United India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 5532 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5532 Del
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2017

Delhi High Court
M/S Securitrans India Pvt Ltd vs United India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors on 9 October, 2017
$~3
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                          Decided on: 9th October, 2017
+      MAC.APP. 862/2015
       M/S SECURITRANS INDIA PVT LTD       ..... Appellant
                      Through: Mr. Harish Kumar Garg, Adv.

                           versus

       UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS .....
                                             Respondents
                     Through: Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for
                              R-1.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. On the claim petition ( Case No. 637/2008) of the second respondent (claimant), the Tribunal by its impugned judgment dated 23.07.2015, which also governed two other cases arising out of same motor vehicular accident, awarded compensation, fastening the liability to pay initially against the first respondent (insurer) of the offending vehicle described as Tata-407 bearing registration No. DL- ILE-9789, however granting it recovery rights against the appellant which statedly was the registered owner of the said vehicle, on the ground that the third respondent (the driver) was not holding a valid or effective driving licence in its respect at the relevant point of time.

2. The appeal at hand challenges the said grant of recovery rights placing reliance on judgment of the Supreme Court in Kulwant Singh

& Ors. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. JT 2014 (12) SC 110.

3. It is noted that the copy of the Registration Certificate of the offending vehicle (Annexure -1 to the appeal) shows that it is registered as a Light Goods Vehicle. Since the Tribunal itself has noted that the driver was holding a valid driving licence inclusive for purpose of light motor vehicle, the grant of recovery rights cannot be sustained.

4. The impugned judgment to the extent it granted recovery rights in favour of the first respondent and against the appellant is set aside.

5. The statutory deposit shall be refunded.

6. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

R.K.GAUBA, J OCTOBER 09, 2017 mr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter